The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: Joseph LeBlanc (---.hsd1.dc.comcast.net - ISP in Kingsville, MD United States)
Date: 2008-05-17 22:51
Attachment: RPM1.jpg (200k)
Attachment: RPM2.jpg (143k)
Attachment: RPM7.jpg (165k)
Attachment: RPM8.jpg (220k)
Attachment: IMG_9746.jpg (174k)
I've been fortunate enough to receive one of the first UHL Reed Profiling Machines(RPM 68). I've posted about this a few times on the bboards...It's finally here and I took some pics(photography is a serious hobby of mine) and would like to share my thoughts on the machine.
First a little background on my reed making. I got a reedual and some blank making tools in March of 2007. In the first week I made about 30 reeds...most were terrible but a few turned out great, actually sounding better than any V12 I had at the time. The next week I used one in a chamber concert and was very happy with the result. Since that time I have been hooked. My reedual profiled reeds have been consistently better and longer lasting than V12s but I grew frustrated with the idiosyncrasies of the reedual. I would ruin a percentage of my blanks because of the inconsistencies of the machine. Some of my reeds are visibly flawed when they come off the dual but due to the virtue of great cane they still play much better than commercial reeds. I could not help but think, if this vamp was more perfectly cut this amazing reed would be even better! I began searching for a more accurate profiler.
There are very few options in this country for reed making tools and also only a few 'reed mentors'. I found some information on the web about some German reed tools and profilers and was intrigued. Hermann Uhl posted some pics of a hand profiler he designed 1998. I contacted him and found he no longer made them however he had plans for a new design. I've been looking forward to it's release ever since and as far as I know....I'm his first customer!
First Impressions
This thing is heavy! I was surprised at how heavy the machine is. It's about 7 lbs, which is heavy for something that is 10 by 20cm(yes it's pretty small). The RPM 68 is very solidly built. The arm swings easily and the back and forth motion along the rail is smooth fast and tight.
Some extra parts I got were two plastic reed guides. One is a model of a V12 and the other a model of a Rue Lepic. I also got an extra cutting blade. Also included is a plate to hold a cane model reed and three allen wrenches to replace removable parts and make adjustments to the reed thickness. Many parts are replaceable and removable. Exchanging parts is very simple. Hermann Uhl recommend changing the blade every 600 reeds(the blade is double sided, so it might yield 300 reeds per side).
Basic use
The principles under which this machine operates are very simple. It's very similar to most bassoon profilers.
On the guide side you have a cane model reed or a plastic guide. A bar rolls over the guide reed(or plastic guide) and tracks the guide side and the blade cuts the cane to shape. It operates much like a key copier. To cut the reed you simply move the blade from side to side. The side to side cutting motion is very smooth and tight, no play or wiggle at all. The block that comes down over the reed is quite heavy and the blade is very sharp so you don't need any additional downward pressure to cut the reed. I was surprised at how easily it cuts through the cane. After a few passes side to side you rotate the cutting block on its axis to create the curvature over the width of the reed. A great design feature of this machine is that, the blade axis will not move until you adjust it. This is very important because it allows you to make a few passes at exactly the same angle and then rotate it just a tiny bit and continue. It allows you to be very methodical and not 'miss' any spots. The bar that the cutting arm slides back and forth on has rubber stoppers on either end, there is no guess work on where to start the vamp. A full stroke will yield the proper vamp length(about 35mm).
The clamp that holds the reed down holds the reed down firmly without torquing it out of shape. It is easy to center the reed and does not skew the reed to one side as you tighten it. The blank is placed directly on the base plate. It does not rest on a protective strip to protect the base plate from getting cut, it does not need one. The plastic guide reed has no shaped tip, it extends straight out and is the same length as the base plate, thus ensuring that on the base plate side(where the blank is being cut) the blade hovers safely above the surface of the base plate. If you choose to use cane as a model, no problem. The base plate the cane model rests on has an offset at the tip end that raises up to meet the edges of the tip of the model reed. The elimination of a protective layer beneath the blank may seem like a minor convenience, but when you are trying to be accurate to the hundredth of a millimeter, eliminating those kinds of variable is a big deal.
Thickness adjustment
One of the stunning design features on this machine is the way thickness is regulated. As you can see from the photos there is a bar that tracks the guide reed as you cut. You can raise or lower that bar, adjusting the thickness of the reed with the two adjustment screws on the top. You can adjust either side individually which is nice. What I didn't realize until I got the machine was that when you turn the adjustment screw, it clicks and locks. Each click adjusts by one hundredths of a millimeter. That amount of fine control is a big headache saver! For example, if you like reed tips that are 0.11mm and you are getting 0.15 on the left and 0.16 on the right you would adjust 4 clicks on the left and 5 on the right. With the reedual and reedmachine, the thickness is also adjusted by a screw, but there is no click and lock, so it's difficult to know exactly how much you are changing the thickness. After making many reeds on the RPM68 I can say that the clicks do correspond to real world measurements, and once you have the correct settings there is no need to reset it from reed to reed, or adjust it as you are making a reed.
The Results
In talking to many clarinetists about this machine, many had trouble believing a blade machine could create a reed that is completely smooth. Knowing Hermann Uhl's expertise, and also having seen the wonderful results of some bassoon profilers I had high hopes for this machine.
I'm happy to report that the results are simply amazing. Perfectly smooth reeds...easily mistaken for commercially made reeds. Near the end of the profiling process you are removing just a light dust. When you are done, no more material will come off. If you decide to reduce the thickness even just by 2 hundredth of a millimeter, you will see a tiny amount of dust coming off. I've demoed the RPM 68 to a few of my colleges and it's been fun to see skepticism turn to amazement.
With my reedual my reeds may vary in thickness up to maybe 0.05 of a millimeter from reed to reed(sometimes even more). That may not sound like much, but there is a big difference from a 0.10mm tip(about right) and 0.15mm(too thick, requires a rerun on the dual or some hand finishing). On the UHL, I'm seeing variation of no more than 0.01mm, all of my reed are coming out around 0.10 to 0.11.
I've included some pictures of finished reeds to show how good the results are. What astonished me is how quickly I was able to get these results(those pictures are the forth and fifth reeds I made on the machine). Even my first reed turned out fantastic. I get the best results by removing a little bit of cane(one or two passes), turning the angle of the blade, remove a tiny bit more, turn again etc. This removes a tiny layer at a time from the entire surface of the reed and then you repeat until the reed is done. In the beginning I made the mistake of removing as much material as I could before moving the angle of the blade. This method led to removing wider strips of cane at a time and would tend to rip out small patches. Another mistake I made at first was pressing down while cutting. With this machine it's not necessary to press, the weight of the cutting block is enough to cut smoothly. So keeping those factors in mind, I've been able to get beautiful looking reeds.
But how do the reeds play?
The reeds are fantastic. As good as the best reeds off my reedual...but my percentage of success has gone way up. Also the tips(and rest of the reed) are more even and symmetrical, so they respond better especially in the upper register. They also require less hand work to balance them(keep in mind, even perfectly symmetrical reeds might need some balancing).
If the measurements are accurate to 0.01 is every reed the same strength? No, this is a reed myth. Measure V12s of different strengths, you will find all the tips are around 0.10. Cane density determines strength. I make my reeds with the tip of the blank about 2mm past the tip line, thus making a longer tip. Almost all of these reeds come off feeling a little soft, then I clip to the desired strength. If a reed comes off too hard I generally don't adjust the settings of the machine, I put the blank back on and move it past the tip line a tiny bit more, and rerun. This moves the heart slightly back and makes the tip slightly longer, yielding a softer reed.
Does every reed off of the RPM 68 play the same? No, and some I might never use, but that is the nature of cane. Even if every reed is made to the same exact dimensions they will still all play differently because each piece of cane is different. But having consistent dimensions from reed to reed is a good place to start from. Before the RPM 68 I was compensating for cane variables and measurement variables, so it was hard to know where to start fixing the problem. I would often get a reed that could do almost everything well but was lacking in some area(response, or articulation etc). I feel the RPM 68 consistently yields more versatile reeds that are not lopsided in their strengths and weaknesses.
Final thoughts
This RPM 68 is well thought out in every aspect and is impeccably designed and machined. It exceeded the high expectations I had for it. With other profilers I've used it can take weeks or months to learn the idiosyncrasies of the machine or reverse engineer a model reed to compensate for inaccuracies built into the design of the profiler. You hear a lot of talk from reed makers on how they have their finally have a good 'system' going. The RPM68 eliminates that headache, it simply works the way it should.
My sincere thanks to Hermann Uhl for keeping me updated throughout this process and for designing such a fabulous machine. I believe Uhl's RPM 68 is the new standard in clarinet profilers and will become a valuable tool for any serious clarinet reed maker.
Post Edited (2008-05-18 16:13)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Ryder (---.dsl.snantx.swbell.net - ISP in Hondo, TX United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 00:01
I have the same question as DavidBlumburg. The website doesn't seem to have a price. It looks as though it has yet to be updated. They must be to busy maing them to update the site. Im really intrigued. It looks simple yet effecive, and judging from your description its a hit for you.
Nice pics by the way. A hobby? Those are art!
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Joseph LeBlanc (---.hsd1.dc.comcast.net - ISP in Kingsville, MD United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 00:25
Here's a cut and paste from the price list on the website:
Reed Profiler 'RPM 68'
1.170,00 €
Plastic guide, Standard model
No. 101: Vandoren White Master, Bb-Clar., German Cut
No. 301: Vandoren V12, Bb-Clar., French Cut
No. 302: Vandoren 56 Rue Lepic, Bb-Clar., French Cut
129,00 €
Plastic guide, custom model
249,00 €
Cutter blade
12,90 €
-Joe
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: redwine (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net - ISP in Edgewater, MD United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 01:04
Hello Joe,
(Disclaimer: I am the North American importer of Canyes Xilema reeds)
Congratulations on your purchase! While I have never met Mr. Uhl, the Xilema people (all of their machines are made by Mr. Uhl) have nothing but over-the-top things to say about his work, and he's apparently an incredibly nice person. I do hope to meet him one day.
Just to keep all this in perspective, with my rough calculations, you'll have about $5 in each reed, once you have made 600 of them. The price goes down, obviously, the more you make. Of course, making them yourself has got to be rewarding (I've never made a reed myself), and when you are in control of the quality, the reeds must "fit" you better.
Knowing something about tooling costs, etc., I don't doubt for a minute that the pricing is right on for this tool (perhaps even on the low side of fair market value), and if one is inclined to purchase one of these machines, there will be no arguments from me, however, the cost per reed is higher than buying a commercial reed. Will commercial reeds surpass that price? Perhaps...perhaps more than likely (especially if someone I know decides to get into reed making, a venture that, honestly, I'm surprised he hasn't already)!
Please keep us posted on your progress!
Ben Redwine
maker of the Gennusa "Excellente" mouthpiece
Buffet Crampon artist/clinician
www.redwinejazz.com
www.canyesxilema.com
clarinet@redwinejazz.com
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Ryder (---.dsl.snantx.swbell.net - ISP in Hondo, TX United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 01:47
I'd have to agree with Ben Redwine. Actually considering how many good reeds do or don't come from a box of commercial reeds, the cost is not that much more. The sense of accomplishment and playing something good that you made is worth the cost to me. Now to go search in my couch cusions for change...
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: skygardener (---.google.com - ISP in Mountain View, CA United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 02:10
In many ways it looks similar to the 'Reed Machine'.
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Joseph LeBlanc (---.hsd1.dc.comcast.net - ISP in Kingsville, MD United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 02:22
Ben,
Good observations. I definitely agree that the price is fair. And the fact that Uhl designed the product himself and has extensive knowledge on how to machine a product to these specs probably brought the cost down even more had something of similar quality been produced by someone else. Similar quality bassoon gear is as much or more.
The irony here is...I could be getting box reeds for free every month from the Marine Band!!!! I have purchased all these tools on my own and I have to say, it's been worth every penny. This tool should be able to last me for as long as I play clarinet(20 more years in the band at least).
For me, the quality is just that much better. For my Marine Band audition I opened up 6 boxes of reeds and 2 were contenders for the audition. I made four reeds yesterday and one out of the four was definitely better than my MB audition reed. The other three were great rehearsal and practice reeds. These reeds will also easily last me 3-4 times longer than a Vandoren. I won't hesitate to do run of chamber rehearsals and the concert on the same reed...something I never felt comfortable with on a Vandoren.
Also every single reed is the perfect strength. It has changed my concept of playing, the reed comes to me now. As my playing subtly changes so does my reed making.
Since I have started making reeds I haven't ever been 'stuck' with no good reeds. Even in practice sessions and rehearsals I'm able to use reeds that I actually ENJOY playing on and for that reason alone it's been worth the cost so many times over.
-Joe
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Koo Young Chung (---.hsd1.il.comcast.net - ISP in United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 02:25
Hi,I'm more interested in your nice pictures.
what's your camera set up?
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Daniel Frazelle (---.dc.dc.cox.net - ISP in United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 02:42
There's really not much that I can add to Joe's review of the RPM 68 because he basically covered everything. I did have a chance to use it today and was blown away. After exceptionally inconsistent results with other reed machines, I was surprised just how easy it was to get this to work properly right from the start. What was most important, however, was that the dimensions were all very precise and consistent. Unlike with the Reedual, all the reeds I made had the same measurements. With the Reedual I was often not even in the same ballpark with some reeds, even though they would still work because of the cane or because I clipped it to the length that was just right. With the Uhl machine, the reeds have very rational vamps and tips that allow for a greater flexibility than I got with my best Dual reeds.
Also, I thought I'd respond to the observation made that it looks like the Dilutis Reed Machine. This has been noted before and it is definitely true. There's a reason for this, and it's not that it is a copy or imitation. This is the same basic concept that bassoon profilers have used for a long time. I believe the Reed Machine was based on this basic concept, but it failed in so many areas to take into consideration many design elements that could be taylored to the making of clarinet reeds. The Uhl product is much better designed, made with much better materials, and executed properly so that it actually works the way it's supposed to. This machine is not a mystery to use or something that requires an aquired touch. It simply profiles the reed in a way that is consistent with the concepts bassoonist have been using for a long time.
It's an excellent product that took only minutes to convince me to get one myself.
Daniel Frazelle
US Navy Band
Post Edited (2008-05-18 02:44)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: RodRubber (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net - ISP in Woodbridge, VA United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 05:12
congrats joe i'd love to try it.
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Dileep Gangolli (---.hsd1.il.comcast.net - ISP in United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 11:56
I, like others on this thread, have used a Duall (prior to having my kids and not having time to even practice!) to mixed success. I agree that good cane can make up for bad cuts.
The Duall is a very old invention at this time and really is quite crude given advances in technology. The fact that someone has made a better system for making reeds is not surprising.
I am glad that people are investing money in trying this device and sharing their results. It would seem that this tool is a large improvement in what we have had in the past.
Anything that can break the Reed Oligopoly is good news.
Power to the People!!!
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: DavidBlumberg (---.hsd1.pa.comcast.net - ISP in Bryn Mawr, PA United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 15:16
Man those are some gorgeous pictures.
Uhl should put them on their website!
David Blumberg
http://www.mytempo.com
Reserve Reeds Artist
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: William (---.dhcp.mdsn.wi.charter.com - ISP in Mc Farland, WI United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 15:53
Reed Profiler 'RPM 68'
1.170,00 €
I'm not familiar with this figure--how much is this in US $$'s??
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: redwine (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net - ISP in Edgewater, MD United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 15:56
Hello,
€ is the symbol for Euro. Today's conversion is 1=1.55531.
Ben Redwine
maker of the Gennusa "Excellente" mouthpiece
Buffet Crampon artist/clinician
www.redwinejazz.com
www.canyesxilema.com
clarinet@redwinejazz.com
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: spartanclarinet (---.no.no.cox.net - ISP in Baton Rouge, LA United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 16:00
Hey Joe,
Long time no see.....hope you're doing wonderfully. Terrifically interesting post! After this season's reeds, I feel it is time for me to investigate this for myself. The shipping cost on that thing from Europe must be huge.
What is the source for your cane?
JCO
Justin O'Dell
http://web.mac.com/clarinetquintet/iWeb/MSUClarinetStudio/MSU.html
http://www.music.msu.edu/people/detail.php?id=83
Post Edited (2008-05-18 17:06)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Joseph LeBlanc (---.hsd1.dc.comcast.net - ISP in Kingsville, MD United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 16:34
Justin!!
It weighs 7 pounds. I see the reason for confusion, I edited the post with a space between the number.
It's definitely worth checking out, might be a great investment for a clarinet reed room at MSU.
Backun is going to be the North American Distributor, but did have mine shipped from Germany because I was anxious to get it asap.
I've been using Glotin tube cane. The seem to have gone out of business and I haven't found it for sale anywhere in a while. I've had success with RDG and Ghys cane as well. I just made a reed with an Oliveri blank yesterday and was intrigued...I may try more of those.
For me good cane has been a critical factor, I've probably tried about 10 different brands and I continue to try new stuff as I find it. I've been amazed at the extreme differences between them all...they each have a personality. It's all about finding the perfect marriage of vamp shape and cane type.
I think Vandoren got it right with the V12 vamp shape, but their cane is just bad. One problem is, they get their cane from three different sources and use all 3 types to make all of their reeds...no wonder most people get only three they like out of a box.
Certain cane types work better at different blank thicknesses as well. For me RDG is terrible as a thick blank(think rue 56) but improves greatly as a thinner blank(think blue box). It's all about trial and error and find what works best for you.
It's been great to get away from the one size fits all mentality of commercial reeds. It's definitely a journey, finding what works best but having a profiler that can deliver a consistent cut eliminates so much headache.
Take care!
-Joe
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: spartanclarinet (---.no.no.cox.net - ISP in Baton Rouge, LA United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 17:12
Joe,
Yes, it seems Vandoren cane is extremely variable in quality. It has been especially frustrating this year. I visited the Uhl Technik website and this reed profiler sounds like an intriguing possibility. What do you use to make blanks out of your cane tubes?
JCO
Justin O'Dell
http://web.mac.com/clarinetquintet/iWeb/MSUClarinetStudio/MSU.html
http://www.music.msu.edu/people/detail.php?id=83
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Joseph LeBlanc (---.hsd1.dc.comcast.net - ISP in Kingsville, MD United States)
Date: 2008-05-18 17:36
Right now I use the Dilutis tools for blank making. However, I have an order with Greg James of Canada for a new planer and shaper.
Theoretically, if the planer is good enough, blanks should come off so flat that they don't need sanding to further flatten the back. My goal is to only have to use sanding as a means to smooth and seal the back. With this new planer I hope to achieve that goal...time will tell, and I'll post my thoughts here on the bboard.
My current shaper has served me well. It's similar to a V12 taper. I'm going to experiment a shaper that has a faster taper...more along the lines of a Gonzalez. This will keep all of the reed on the table of the mouthpiece which should result in improved response...again, time will tell.
I use an RDG Bassoon cane guillotine to cut the cane to length after it's split. I find it's a time saver and its easier to pick out the exact part of the cane that is the straightest.
-Joe
Post Edited (2008-05-18 18:31)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: jcfasanar (217.168.3.---)
Date: 2008-05-19 11:55
Hi Joseph, im a dilutis machine user and i have ordered the uhl machine today. I have some questions for you:
- This machine works better with dry or wet reed blanks? How you are using it?
- The blade not break the sides and tips of the blank when you are finishing?
- How long takes to make 1 reed?
- Making "reed to reed" copies, the machine ruins the model reed like the dilutis? How many copies can you make from a model reed?
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Joseph LeBlanc (---.hsd1.dc.comcast.net - ISP in Kingsville, MD United States)
Date: 2008-05-19 15:04
jcfasanar wrote:
>
> - This machine works better with dry or wet reed blanks? How
> you are using it?
Dry only. No need to wet the reed to make it easier to cut
> - The blade not break the sides and tips of the blank when you
> are finishing?
No. The tip can fray a little bit, but the part the fraying only occurs above where you will need to clip.
>
> - How long takes to make 1 reed?
For me it takes 3-5 minutes, that time might improve as I make more reeds.
> - Making "reed to reed" copies, the machine ruins the model
> reed like the dilutis? How many copies can you make from a
> model reed?
So far I have only used the plastic guide. If you are going to spend the money on the profiler, I highly recommend a plastic guide, it's expertly made and the dimensions seem very symmetrical.
When I first got the machine I did mess around a little with rolling the guide bar over a vandoren reed just to see how it would hold up. Since the bar actually rolls and you don't need any pressure I think the reed will hold up pretty well. It certainly won't destroy the cane model as often happens with the Dilutis. Over time, the cane model may need to be changed...I'd have to do some experimenting, I just haven't had the need to try it since the plastic guide is yielding such great reeds!
Congrats on your order, and good luck!
-Joe
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: jcfasanar (217.168.3.---)
Date: 2008-05-19 16:23
I ordered the V12 guide too. (And a extra blade, complete equipment)
Im only curious about the "reed to reed" copies because i prefer V12 cut, but i would like to experiment with other cut/cane combination like gonzalez cut, Ricos or Alexander cut... or something else, and do not want to spend more money in each custom guide only for this "curious experiments".
If a model reed last for about... 20-30 perfect copies before ruin... i think its sufficient for cut/cane combination experiments.
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Daniel Frazelle (---.dc.dc.cox.net - ISP in United States)
Date: 2008-06-13 05:10
I received my machine this week, so I thought I'd give an update of sorts.
The RPM 68 is incredible. That's all there is to it. I've made a bunch of reeds already using different types of cane. I also experimented with blanks I made from the tube alongside commercial pre-made blanks. Every reed I made was workable and one I'd feel comfortable using in rehearsal. As it stands, I have five that blow away all of the commercial reeds I have. After already using a reed I made on Joe's machine for my last concert, I can say with complete certainty that I will be using one of these new reeds on my concert next week.
I believe the best reeds are the ones I make from the tube. I don't know exactly why, but these just seem to be better even when factors such as blank thickness, length, and taper are just about equal. Still, I think making reeds on this machine from commercial blanks is a very viable option, with relatively little lost in quality. Of course, the greater value is in making the blanks from the tube.
I mention all this only because my point is that this machine really produces a quality reed from any suitable blank. It's so easy to use that I have no concerns as I put another blank on and go to work. I'm not overstating anything when I say that it will completely change my playing and my day-to-day approach to practicing and preparation. I know the price will be prohibitive for many, but I feel as if this is an investment along the lines of what bassoonists make. After seeing, using, and now owning the machine, it's hard for me to say that it isn't worth it for just about any serious player.
I should also note that Hermann Uhl has been wonderful to deal with. I understand he will be passing off the North American distributing at some point, but for the time being he's a pleasure to work with.
Daniel Frazelle
US Navy Band
Post Edited (2008-06-13 05:17)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: atasic (---.dynamic.sbb.rs - ISP in Beograd, 02 Serbia and Montenegro)
Date: 2008-06-13 21:10
i have also receved mine 3 days ago ...........I am so sutisfied with the result I get ........worth every Euro and beyond....after review Joe and Daniel wrote I can not add anything....just simply can say that everybody should own one.....
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: jcfasanar (217.168.4.---)
Date: 2008-06-13 22:14
I received mine 2 weeks ago... i agree with the comments. The machine is incredible.
But im having problems getting good reeds. I thinks the problem is not the machine.
I think its the flat side of the reed... i use sandpaper and bastard files, but i think my reeds warps.
Other problem is the material and the reed strength im getting.
Im using Neuranter cane, and i have Silvacane, Rigotti and Ghys.
Which cane you prefer and what aproximated strength are you geeting?
And what reed measurements are you using? Im cutting V12 style 3,15 with 0.10 on the tip, but all the reeds are soft or very soft for me (i need 4 - 4,5)
Any tricks to get the reed table perfectly Flat?
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Ed Palanker (---.proxy.aol.com - ISP in United States)
Date: 2008-06-13 23:13
I was over Joes’ place last week and tried the machine, I came home and immediately ordered one from Backun, delivery expected some times this summer. I’m buying it because I intend to make my students reeds in rep. class every week or two. It was too difficult to do that in mass on my reedual. The Uhl is much faster when making a whole bunch. Of course cane is like fine wine, there are good years and bad. Too much sun, too much rain, not enough of either and a $100 bottle of Burgundy one year is $6 the next. The same with cane, the only difference is that they don’t charge less when the cane is inferior like they do with wine. There is actually quality control for wine; apparently we can’t say the same about making reeds, any brand. You can drink the $6 Burgundy but it sure isn’t the same as the $100 bottle. You may be able to play all the reeds in a box but at what quality? ESP www.peabody.jhu.edu/457 (Listen to a little Mozart)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Remi (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net - ISP in Elkridge, MD United States)
Date: 2008-07-09 13:52
Has anyone used the BKM 4 reed machine made by Wilfried Schmidt Maschinenbau (see attached photo)? I learned about it
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Remi (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net - ISP in Elkridge, MD United States)
Date: 2008-07-09 13:58
Attachment: BKM 4.JPG (422k)
Has anyone used the BKM 4 reed machine made by Wilfried Schmidt Maschinenbau (see attached photo)? I learned about it from Dan Gilbert. I tried his and it works great. I put in an order almost a year ago and am still waiting.
I'm wondering how it compares to the Uhl machine being discussed? As they are comparable in price (I actually think the Uhl is cheaper), and I haven't yet paid for the machine that has taken so long, and given the great reviews of the Uhl product, I'm thinking of going with the Uhl. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: mnorswor (---.hsd1.ma.comcast.net - ISP in Mechanicsville, VA United States)
Date: 2008-07-09 15:38
Hi Remi and Joseph,
I'm wondering, since you have these two machines, if you could tell me how they deal with the rails (meaning the extreme left and right sides) of the reed. In my experience with a DuAl, the big flaw in the design is that the rails are not shaped properly because the sanding wheel simply cannot get to them. I think this happens because the table that the reed sits on is too wide. From the looks of it, the same is true of the BKM4.
The Uhl seems to be better designed in this regard with a tapered edge that I can see in one or two of the pics. I also think the Dilutis machine deals better with the rails and is more similar in design to the Uhl.
Can either of you, or others, comment on this?
Thanks!
--Michael Norsworthy
Professor of Clarinet, The Boston Conservatory
Principal Clarinet, BMOP
Artist in Residence Harvard University, HGNM
Performing Artist/Clinician Buffet Crampon, Rico Reeds
http://www.michaelnorsworthy.com
Post Edited (2008-07-09 15:40)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Remi (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net - ISP in Elkridge, MD United States)
Date: 2008-07-09 16:49
Hi Michael,
Yes, I also like the idea of the tapered edge of the Uhl. I don't actually own the BKM4 so I only have minimal experience with it, but it seemed to cut the rails properly. Also, though the BKM4 has a vacuum hook-up, it can make quite a mess. Not having to plug anything in or change sandpaper every few reeds also seems like a plus. Hopefully I'll get a chance to try out one of these before I commit to the BKM4.
Remi
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Joseph LeBlanc (---.hsd1.dc.comcast.net - ISP in United States)
Date: 2008-07-09 17:03
Remi,
Thanks for posting the pic of the BKM4...I had wondering what it looked like.
So the BKM is still being made? Interesting...I located a used one in Germany a while back for the price of 800 euros...but I never went through with the purchase.
One huge advantage of a machine like the Uhl is....way less mess. With a belt style profiler you also need a vacuum(the machine and vacuum going can also be quite noisy). Also, you need an electric outlet. With the Uhl you can use it anywhere, easily take it with you on trips, and just brush the mess into a waste basket when you are done.
Michael,
As far as I can tell, and my reed gauge will allow me to measure...the Uhl makes an EXACT copy. My thinking is....since even a swipe of sandpaper can make a big difference, and the fact that, that swipe is basically not measurable with something like the perfectareed, if you can see or even measure inconsistencies...then the machine is not consistent or accurate. Accurate measurements are not the end all...as cane can vary wildly in density even within the same blank. But I think accurate measurements are a good place to start.
I think there is more going on with the Dual than meets the eye. People often find problems in the tip and the rails of dual reeds. I think this is due mostly to the fact that those are the easiest places on a reed to measure. I suspect there are similar inconsistencies over the entire vamp, that are very hard to measure with something like the perfectareed.
That is not to say however, that the reedual can't make great reeds. I played dual reeds for a year and would go back to it if I had to. It's just a matter of putting in the time to set it up so it works for you, and then understanding that it will produce unplayable measurements from time to time.
-Joe
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Remi (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net - ISP in Elkridge, MD United States)
Date: 2008-07-09 17:38
Hi Joe,
Yes, I completely agree with the noise/mess issue. I sent you an email about possibly trying yours while I'm in the area, or maybe you know of someone else in the Baltimore area that has one that could let me take a look?
Thanks again,
Remi
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
What's Happening? |
September 2010 |
Today: |
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
 |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Clarinet Pages is sponsored by:
|
 |