Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 How Downward “Rail Tilt” is formed
Author: Dan Shusta 
Date:   2026-04-16 09:07

Much has been written on this subject which affects regular hard rubber mouthpieces. This “Rail Tilt” does not appear to affect plastic or glass (quartz) mouthpieces due to the greater hardness of these materials. Now as to the new H.D. (High Density) mouthpieces, there doesn’t appear to be much written about them due their newness in the market. However, because H.D. mouthpieces are still not as hard a material as plastic or glass, I believe that “Rail Tilt” will still occur in them but at a possibly slower rate.

Way back in the year 2000, Robin posted a question on this BB entitled “When is a mouthpiece finished?” http://test.woodwind.org/clarinet/Bboard/read.html?f=1&i=33455&t=33445 Anji and especially Ken Shaw posted some very interesting comments, imho, about the longevity of mouthpieces, however, neither of their posts mention “Rail Tilt” per se.

Then in 2013, beejay posted the question: “Do mouthpieces wear out?” http://test.woodwind.org/clarinet/Bboard/read.html?f=1&i=391823&t=391776 Paul Aviles quotes Brad Behn’s statement: “...the constant swatting of the reed against the facing will actually cause the dimensions to change slowly, usually causing a noticeable difference after about five years of constant play. Look at the rails and find the dulled surfaces where the reed is making constant hits…….pretty obvious.” Later, in the same thread, Brad himself wrote: “The more you use your mouthpiece the quicker it wears out. This occurs as a result of the reed’s vibration against the mouthpiece rails. In fact the reed acts like an abrasive and gradually bevels the rails inward, making what we call “rail tilt”. He also mentions: “rail tilt from professional usage is about 1 year...” Here Brad uses the words “rail tilt”, however, he doesn’t fully explain “why it’s slopped downward” imho.

So, I persisted in my search for the “how” and “why” and finally came upon a lengthy, 12 page article written by Clarinet Clinic.
https://www.midwestclinic.org/user_files_1/pdfs/clinicianmaterials/2001/west.pdf Even though it was written 25 years ago, when I read page 4, I found what I was looking for in the 5th paragraph entitled “The Mouthpiece”. What I found were the sentences: “Remember also that mouthpieces wear out--the facing either accumulates scratches or nick marks from careless treatment, or the side rails begin to tilt inward as a result of slow erosion caused by the (slightly convex) reed's vibration. As a mouthpiece wears out, one naturally picks progressively harder reeds to compensate for the loss of resistance in the facing. The final symptom of erosion on the insides of the rails ("rail tilt") is a high-pitched whistle or "chirp" associated with articulation. With rail tilt of this magnitude, the mouthpiece should either be replaced or refaced. In most cases, replacement will be the easiest option.”

So, I believe I found the "why" and "how". As I interpret the above, the conclusion I come up with is: The reed is not only vibrating up and down at the tip but it is also “vibrating” laterally in the middle in a slight convex manner which causes a slow abrasive action on the side rails with more abrasive force on the inside of the rail as opposed to the outside.

(Actually, I believe it is the lateral “concave” reed’s vibration cycle coupled with the pressure from the bottom lip which puts more abrasive action on the inside of the rail which causes the downward “rail tilt”.

Any thoughts?

Do you interpret the analysis by Clarinet Clinic differently?



Reply To Message
 
 Re: How Downward “Rail Tilt” is formed
Author: kurth83 
Date:   2026-04-16 09:29

Fascinating. I was wondering in the other thread if anyone could definitively answer whether a reed could actually erode mouthpiece material.

I think this answers it pretty well and tells us what to look for, and to some extent which materials are more vulnerable, many thanks.

To reiterate what I said before, things that could reduce erosion are:
- sanding the backs of reeds to a glassy smooth finish as part of reed prep.
- cleaning reeds when done playing, don't let them dry out uncleaned, as deposits will build up that can add abrasive qualities to the reed.
- always wipe the mouthpiece clean too.

I play a BD2, and checked, they are high density rubber, so prone to abrasion, I guess it's a replacement every year or so then, or I will buy a new one after a year and see if there is any noticeable difference. The HD's are also high density rubber, and are 50% higher density than the BD's, not sure if that makes them harder or softer though.

Aging classical trumpet player learning clarinet as a second.

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org