Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Clark Fobes Cicero vs. San Francisco
Author: c256 
Date:   2015-03-01 00:58

Hello all,

Recently decided to upgrade from my B45 to something more easy blowing, and ordered a Clark Fobes Cicero 13. The decision to choose that particular model was largely encouraged by the great deal available at the Woodwind/Brasswind on refurbished mouthpieces, but also came close to the tip opening and facing of the San Francisco CF+ I had my eye on. The Cicero is a huge step up from my B45, though my curiosity continues to wonder how the San Fran CF+ model with a slightly smaller tip opening and longer facing compares. I may just order one to give it a try, but I'm curious about the opinions of those on the board. Thanks

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Clark Fobes Cicero vs. San Francisco
Author: maxopf 
Date:   2015-03-01 02:37

I've never tried the Cicero or the CF+, but I play on a CWF and I love it. It's very free-blowing and reed-friendly (I've had the best success with Peter Leuthner #4s), with lots of color and upper overtones in the sound. Not "bright" in the negative sense by any means, just colorful. It projects nicely over an ensemble.
The CWF has a small tip opening and a longer facing.
I've been to Clark Fobes's house where he makes all of the mouthpieces; his process of adjusting and test-playing each mouthpiece is really interesting.



Post Edited (2015-03-01 06:41)

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Clark Fobes Cicero vs. San Francisco
Author: cxgreen48 
Date:   2015-03-01 03:19

I own the CF+ and have tried a couple Cicero models. I thought the Cicero had a smaller, more compact, but brighter sound.

I ended up returning the Ciceros I had on trial because I felt like I could not project through an orchestra as easily as the CF+, which for me has a slightly bigger, slightly more free-blowing, and slightly darker sound. Also I tended to squeak a lot more on the Cicero models for some reason; perhaps it is the shorter facing along with the baffle shape.

If you decide to try the CF+, just make sure there is a return policy in case you do not like it as much as your Cicero.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Clark Fobes Cicero vs. San Francisco
Author: Ed 
Date:   2015-03-01 21:14

It is tough to say, as each person is different. I have played a CF+ for many years. Recently I tried a Cicero model that a friend had and was very impressed with what a really nice mouthpiece it is. They are slightly different, but are both excellent.

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org