The Clarinet BBoard

Re: c=256

Author: SirNDPT  Date:   2015-02-02 02:08 Thanks for your responses and suggestions... But about the internal tuning, since the clarinet is tuned in equal temperament, would I not want the rest of the notes to also change so that they fall into proportion (harmony?) to the 432? I mean, I'd love to have a 432 tuned in Pythagorian 5ths but then it would really have to be made of licorice! Bearing in mind that A=432 really means B in the clarion register, how much out of tune could the rest of the instrument be? What I am saying is, if I were tuning an open instrument - that is, on G - then I might expect much more distortion as I closed the tone holes "below," but if I am tuning the instrument with all the tone holes closed would there not be less distortion as I opened the tone holes? Or is my penchant for logic confusing me????

Topics	Author	Date
c=256  new	sturmantheyounger	2007-01-12 17:44
Re: c=256  new	Mark Charette	2007-01-12 18:07
Re: c=256  new	sturmantheyounger	2007-01-12 18:09
Re: c=256  new	Chris P	2007-01-12 18:21
Re: c=256  new	sturmantheyounger	2007-01-12 18:29
Re: c=256  new	Ken Shaw	2007-01-12 19:01
Re: c=256  new	Chris P	2007-01-12 19:58
Re: c=256  new	Mark Charette	2007-01-12 20:25
Re: c=256  new	Alphie	2007-01-12 20:35
Re: c=256  new	pzaur	2007-01-13 00:25
Re: c=256  new	Tony Pay	2007-01-13 08:39
Re: c=256  new	Lelia Loban	2007-01-13 11:06
Re: c=256  new	Don Berger	2007-01-13 14:07
Re: c=256  new	Don Berger	2007-01-13 14:20
Re: c=256  new	pzaur	2007-01-13 15:06
Re: c=256  new	EEBaum	2007-01-13 20:16
Re: c=256  new	sturmantheyounger	2007-01-13 20:35
Re: c=256  new	Mark Charette	2007-01-13 21:13
Re: c=256  new	sturmantheyounger	2007-01-13 21:51
Re: c=256  new	Mark Charette	2007-01-14 00:03
Re: c=256  new	SirNDPT	2015-02-01 18:47
Re: c=256  new	pzaur	2007-01-15 05:01
Re: c=256  new	Chris P	2007-01-15 08:03
Re: c=256  new	EuGeneSee	2007-01-15 14:33
Re: c=256  new	sturmantheyounger	2007-01-15 15:19
Re: c=256  new	Mark Charette	2007-01-15 15:32
Re: c=256  new	sturmantheyounger	2007-01-15 15:43
Re: c=256  new	Mark Charette	2007-01-15 16:04
Re: c=256  new	Bennett	2007-01-15 16:17
Re: c=256  new	Chris P	2007-01-15 17:05
Re: c=256  new	sturmantheyounger	2007-01-15 17:55
Re: c=256  new	Chris P	2007-01-15 18:03
Re: c=256  new	Bennett	2007-01-16 05:51
Re: c=256  new	sturmantheyounger	2007-01-16 12:59
Re: c=256  new	Bennett	2007-01-17 15:39
Re: c=256  new	D	2007-01-17 18:09
Re: c=256  new	sturmantheyounger	2007-01-20 15:11
Re: c=256  new	Caroline Smale	2015-02-01 21:41
Re: c=256  new	Bennett	2015-02-02 01:33
Re: c=256  new	Chris P	2015-02-01 22:21
Re: c=256  new	SirNDPT	2015-02-02 02:08
Re: c=256  new	c256	2015-02-02 03:12
Re: c=256  new	SirNDPT	2015-02-02 04:24
Re: c=256  new	Chris P	2015-02-02 04:38
Re: c=256  new	SirNDPT	2015-02-02 08:54
Re: c=256  new	Wes	2015-02-02 09:37

Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here

User Login  User Name:  Password:  Remember my login:

Forgot Your Password? Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.