 The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: fskelley
Date: 2014-04-25 19:13
Why not try it both ways and choose whichever sounds best to you?
Stan in Orlando
EWI 4000S with modifications
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Paul Aviles
Date: 2014-04-25 19:30
It's an alberti bass accompaniment to the strings. I would think ANY articulation here would be too peckish.....generally always slurred throughout.
..........Paul Aviles
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: ThatPerfectReed
Date: 2014-04-25 19:38
So that we're on the same page, perhaps you can find your way to the version of the piece I am looking at, void of much in the way of anything but notes, but easily accessible and not ia infringement of the published works that have been edited by artists. Instructions for access of in here.
http://test.woodwind.org/oboe/BBoard/read.html?f=1&i=404916&t=404916
That said, I'm with Paul, as measure 324 I've always heard and played slurred, though Stan's point is not without merit because there are so many ways artists have played this piece.
I might find it odd, but at the same time impressed with the technical ability of someone who could tongue those 16th's, not merely one note away, at the accepted speeds this piece is played at.
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Ed Palanker
Date: 2014-04-26 16:58
So many different players use different articulations throughout the concerto because every edition is different. Use what you think sounds the best for you, smooth and clean. It's not like Brahms that wrote in his own.
ESP eddiesclarinet.com
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
 |
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
