Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris J 
Date:   2012-09-24 12:14

I have just bought, and received, a pair of R13s (1974)

Both have "UK" stamped just below the Buffet logo of the UJ.

The only mention of this from searches suggests that this means that they were made to A=440 and for the UK market (this from a website of a company that sells many high end instruments in UK, and mentioned in one of their adverts).

I know there are many on this board well versed in the lore of Buffet instruments. I wonder if I can tap the collective knowledge and ask what you believe the "UK" stamp to signify.

Another question

The A has serial 144xxx and the Bb has serial B143xxx (on UJs and LJs)

Another web search does not yield anything to say why the Bb serial starts with a B. I would like to think that the instruments were factory matched, and the B shows which joints are the Bb. But that is just my imagination.

I confess never to have strayed to R13s before, having remained faithful to my Leblanc Opus over all these years, with my faith tested occasionally (and seriously) by my Couesnon Monopole (oh, and a pair of FB Selmer CTs). This means I have only the internet as my guide when it comes to serial numbers, and I had not expected to see the B at the beginning of the Bb serial number.

Apologies if this has been covered in previous threads, in which case my not finding those threads is down to lack of searching skill, but not lack of effort!

Chris

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: John Peacock 
Date:   2012-09-24 16:00

I'm sure I've read (probably on this Board - try a search) that the UK stamp was introduced as a marketing device by Buffet at the time the RC was developed (1975). The reasoning was that that the RC was more free-blowing than the R13, and thus thought to be more similar to the instruments UK players were used to playing. If this is so, then your instruments are early RCs, not R13s. The easiest way to tell is put a finger up the bell: the R13 has a "choke" where the diameter
at the end of the bottom joint is wider than the entrance to the bell, whereas the RC has no discontinuity in bore diameter at this point.

In any case, the UK label doesn't relate to 440 pitch. All Buffets are supposed to be 440, unless there is an "F" before the serial number, which denotes 442 pitch.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris P 
Date:   2012-09-24 20:21

I've seen RC UK clarinets from the '70s, but never R13 UK.

Former oboe finisher
Howarth of London
1998 - 2010

The opinions I express are my own.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris J 
Date:   2012-09-24 22:26

So to consider whether they are RCs...

All things so far point against that they are RCs

Looking the serial numbers up on the Buffet website (given that they are not always accurate) I get the Bb identified as a R13, and the A has no model (for which I understand the R13 is always assumed)

The serials show these results:

(B)143xxx Bb as: R 13 Am?rique 17/01/1974
144xxx A as: La Am?rique 18/02/1974

I had not previously heard that the step in bore sizes between the LJ and bell as being a distinguishing feature between RCs and R13s.

How big is the step in the R13s?

In my instruments there is just the merest hint of a step, but I can feel that the LJ lower bore is wider than the bell it meets. It is a fraction of 1mm. Tricky to photo, but see below:



Here are a couple of pictures to show the stamp.





Were RCs ever sold unmarked? Any other distinguishing features?

The current possibilities so far are that the early RC was marked UK rather than RC and my instruments are RCs - in which case the slight step between LJ and bell is not significant enough to make it a R13 (hence the question, any other distinguishing features to consider), and they were still referred to as R13 model

Or

My instruments are R13s and the UK stamp was put on for some other reason.

And any thoughts on the B prefix to the Bb serial number?

Anybody got a 1974 Buffet catalogue?

Chris

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris P 
Date:   2012-09-25 00:42

The RC UKs I've seen had the cursive RC logo and the UK stamped below it, but that's the first time I've seen just the UK stamp.

What diameter is the bore at the middle tenon? R13s are 14.65mm and I think the RC is 14.75mm.

Former oboe finisher
Howarth of London
1998 - 2010

The opinions I express are my own.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: John Peacock 
Date:   2012-09-25 08:43

The lack of the RC logo could be explained by the date of 1974, since it was only about the time that the RC was officially introduced. I believe that Buffet did quite a bit of experimenting with an R13 alternative before they settled on the RC, and there were RC forerunners labelled S1 and BC20, so I could believe that the plain UK label might have been another one of this sort. I also have seen instruments with both RC and UK stamps, but I suppose this could be a transitional case?

Still, it's the bore that counts. I tried to measure the bottom end of my R13, and got 16.70 mm for the exit diameter of the lower joint. But I couldn't get inside the bell to get an accurate measurement of the choke. Feeling by finger, I'd say the step is half to one mm. I also just discovered on this board the statement that the RC is 3mm longer than the R13.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris J 
Date:   2012-09-25 08:58

All good information, thanks. On a search I also found that:

"The S1, Continentale and BC20, which became the RC, were all attempts to make darker, more focused sounding clarinets"

Does anybody know how these models were marked on the instrument? Or bore characteristics?

I will do some measuring when I get home tonight

Chris

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris P 
Date:   2012-09-25 09:12

I think I may have seen S1 clarinets with the UK stamp on them as well - hope I'm not imagining it!

Former oboe finisher
Howarth of London
1998 - 2010

The opinions I express are my own.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Paula S 
Date:   2012-09-25 09:29

There is a pair of S1s on this website
http://www.clarinetsdirect.biz/Ingamells-S1s.html
I can make out from the photos that one of them appears to be stamped UK on the top joint.



Post Edited (2012-09-25 09:34)

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris P 
Date:   2012-09-25 09:52

Thanks for that - I knew I'd seen one but thought my mind was playing tricks on me!
http://www.clarinetsdirect.biz/Ingamells-S1s.html

I worked on a friend's R13 from the mid '80s which had a top joint transplant carried out at the B&H factory in London. How could I tell? The serial number was stamped on the top joint above the speaker bush like it is on B&H clarinets and the number stamps used were the same style (font or whatever) as B&H clarinets instead of by the C#/G# tonehole or with the more decorative style number stamps Buffet use.

Former oboe finisher
Howarth of London
1998 - 2010

The opinions I express are my own.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: stevesklar 
Date:   2012-09-25 12:13

A friend of mine has an S1 that I can check
I also have a BC-20
a 1974 R13
and an RC Prestige though of course a much later manufacturing date

==========
Stephen Sklar
My YouTube Channel of Clarinet Information

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: stevesklar 
Date:   2012-09-25 12:22

From some notes that I have the distance of the mid point of the register vent from the top of the joint (excluding the tenon) shows a significant difference between the BC-20 and R13. unfortunately no notes for an early RC. I do have a modern RC Prestige I could check plus what I mentioned above.

reg vent
BC-20 15.6mm

1965
R-13 18.95

1969
R13 19

==========
Stephen Sklar
My YouTube Channel of Clarinet Information

Post Edited (2012-09-25 12:27)

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris J 
Date:   2012-09-25 12:55

More measuring from me, then, when I get home tonight.

The only other reference I could see to the UK stamp was on another couple of clarinets being sold on the website just mentioned, but they are all RCs and I was reticent to post a link to them as they were actively being sold and so might incur the wrath of moderators...

But RCs are clearly marked as such, and the S1 I think was marked as such, but difficult to make out on my phone screen. The S1 in the advert was 1973, so a contempory of mine.

When the RC and S1 serials are searched on the Buffet website, do the results show their model name?

I will do the measurements tonight and report back, but it is looking more likely that mine are R13s and marked UK, and that not many are around.

If that is case, it still begs the question, what does the UK stamp actually signify, and that goes for the stamp seen on S1, RC or R13?

And still no light on the B prefix to the Bb serial number

Thanks for all your input, I am learning a heck of alot about Buffet instruments!

Chris

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris P 
Date:   2012-09-25 13:09

I think the Buffet site gives the model number as opposed to the actual model name as we know it - usually a four-figured number, so an RC Bb will be 1111, RC A is 1211, RC with an Ab/Eb lever is 1113, RC Prestige is 1106L, an R13 Bb is 1131, A is 1231 and R13 Prestige Bb is 1133L.

There is logic to these numbers, I'm sure with more time to study them I'll work it out.

Former oboe finisher
Howarth of London
1998 - 2010

The opinions I express are my own.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris J 
Date:   2012-09-25 13:39

The buffet web site did not give any codes, just R13 for the Bb and La for the A, both followed by Am?rique

As for the codes, This is what I gleaned in 2009 pasted below:


Author: Chris J (---.range81-156.btcentralplus.com - ISP in Bristol, B7 United Kingdom)
Date:   2009-01-27 18:17

I have posted this before, so apologies for repetition here

Looks like 16 relates to Key of C.....

***************************************************

Below is a collation of information from the BB regarding common info on Buffet site

Model designation n�1 indicates polycylindrical bore
Am�rique appears to be the designation for an R13 made for American market

It looks like that if there are no other codes, it is assumed to be a R13

Decoding the letter and number sequence

For a sequence such as BCxxyy(c)-d-e ...............

BC = Buffet Crampon

xx
This specifies the key, with
11 = Bb (old code, SiB=Bb)
12 = A (old code, La=A)
15 = Eb (old code, MiB=Eb)
17 = F

yy
This specifies the model, with
02 = E13
12 = RC
31 = R13
83 = Prestige RC Bass to Eb
93 = Prestige RC Bass to low C
23 = Basset

c
Optional code, meaning
G = greenline
L = Left hand Eb lever

d
Specifies key plating, where
02 = silver
05 = nickle

e
Specifies pitch
0 = 440
2 = 442
4 = 444

So

BC1131(L)-02-0 equals a Bb (11) R13 (31) with a LH Eb lever (L) with silver plated keys (02) tuned to 440 (0)

Information attributed to Jack Kissinger and Francois Kloc

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris J 
Date:   2012-09-25 14:26

In fact, these were sold as BC1102-2 and BC1102L-2 which translates as 2 Bb E13s - one having a L hand Eb lever

So the seller had plugged the serials into the buffet website and advertised them as the first thing that came up.

Clearly the picture showed an A and Bb, and the second choice of R13s in the serial look up was closer to the mark, but the labelling made them a bit of a bargain...

Chris

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Chris J 
Date:   2012-09-25 18:03

So home and measuring...

Just for clarity, these are the measurements of the Bb, and I will take measurements on the dimensions as they appear in the thread

Diameter of bore at middle tenon - this lower bore of the upper joint
14.50
so less than either of Chris P's figures (R13 14.65; RC 14.75)

Exit diameter of lower joint. Hard to measure as there is a flare out there
22.30
Much larger than John Peacock's measurement16.70, though the flare may confound the measurement

Mid reg vent to top of joint, excluding tenon
18.75
Closer to Steve's R13


Steve - if you have an R13 of the same year as mine, then a few choice measurements from your for comparison should clinch it.

Are there any distinguishing key work features that would help, so I can take other pictures?

I hope people like Jack Kissinger or Francois Klos might wander by this thread, to see if they have any views about what the UK stamp was all about, as I think we are going to prove my instruments are R13s but not get any further about the UK stamp. I assume it is for the same reason as the UK stamp on the RCs and S1s - but why?

And the B prefix to the serial?....

Are Buffet Company responsive to email questions like this?

Chris

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: John Peacock 
Date:   2012-09-26 07:46

Sorry, don't know what happened with my exit bore measurement: maybe the calipers weren't zeroed, and I failed to notice. Anyway, the correct figure for my R13 is 21.70 mm, which sounds significantly narrower than yours, so it's not clear the RC hypothesis is ruled out. Perhaps an easier way to tell is just via the thickness of the wood at the end of the tenon: because the RC flares more, the end of the tenon looks much thinner than an R13 - you can easily see the difference by eye (do you know anyone with an R13?).

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: Caroline Smale 
Date:   2012-09-26 14:35

My S1 Bb (1972) lists on the Buffet site as an "S1 Amerique"and the above advertised A clarinet (1973) lists as "S1 La avec leviers Mib" however the 1980 Bb advertised shows up as BC1111 so perhaps Buffet changed their listing policy between these years.

My 1972 S1 A shows up as a BC 1102 made in 2001 - so much for their accuracy!

Have just noticed that one of the 2 instruments advertised, the later 1980 A clarinet, has the UK stamp on it but the 1973 Bb does not.

The advertised S1s are I recall nice instruments - some 20 years ago my 2nd in a pit orchestra played on them - she had borrowed them from her then teacher who I know died recently.

I suspect that the UK stamp has more to do with "marketing" than anything really technical. I think it was John Coppen who some years ago told me that Buffet were making quite a push to convert the UK players of B&H clarinets to move to Buffet. John was heavily involved with Buffet UK for many years.

Even many Yamaha clarinets imported here (mainly student models) have had a UK stamp for some years now but the only technical difference I know of is that they supply a 6C rather than 4C mouthpiece.



Post Edited (2012-09-26 15:27)

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Does R13, stamped UK denote A=440?
Author: stevesklar 
Date:   2012-09-26 15:49

It's odd too that a few years later in 1981 Boosey & Hawkes bought Buffet.

==========
Stephen Sklar
My YouTube Channel of Clarinet Information

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org