Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Previous Message  |  Next Message 
 Re: C3 or C4
Author: Tobin 
Date:   2008-07-15 18:07

"I think the idea of transposing instruments is very good. I definitely think it's better than learning new fingerings for each member of the family (regardless of whether the transposition is an octave or any interval)."

An excellent point that gave me pause as I was thinking about the world without transposition. As much as it appears to be a hassle (and for some it would be) I imagine that this wouldn't be as difficult as it seems. When I play saxophone I don't become confused about reading the music, despite the fact that the finger patterns are similar and the note reading is different. (And as far as uncomfortable keys go you don't hear flautists and violinists bemoaning the lack of instruments in B.)

Certainly there are those who are extremely comfortable with all the transpositions that we need to be able to do and can do so on sight. When I was young I could read A parts on Bb clarinet relatively easily. Now I don't...I have an A clarinet.

"I am interested in reasons why bass clef makes more sense that are more important [then my reasons for staying in treble clef]."

Because we would be reading the notes in the octave that they sound. (Of course this will never change...too many clarinetists trained, too much music printed, no real reason to!).

I have never stated that we should change from what already exists. I described what would have made more sense from the beginning (if we could go back and change it). Do you believe that it's easier for bass clarinetists to have to accommodate differences based on the country of origin and composer/publisher's intentions? Wouldn't one system have been simpler? Why shouldn't the bass clarinet be written in its' sounding pitches when most instruments ARE given their sounding pitches?

If you rewrite or arrange music that is uncomfortably written for you that is the solution that works for you (and many!). I read bass clef now because I play in bass clef (along with treble).

James

Gnothi Seauton

 Reply To Message  |  Avail. Forums  |  Flat View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 

 Topics Author  Date
 C3 or C4  new
alanporter 2008-07-15 01:20 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
Ashley91489 2008-07-15 01:30 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
Ed Palanker 2008-07-15 02:34 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
Mark Charette 2008-07-15 03:06 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
Tobin 2008-07-15 02:48 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
clarnibass 2008-07-15 04:52 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
Lelia Loban 2008-07-15 12:19 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
Tobin 2008-07-15 12:28 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
John25 2008-07-15 12:57 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
Ed Palanker 2008-07-15 13:09 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
JJAlbrecht 2008-07-15 13:12 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
clarnibass 2008-07-15 13:18 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
Tobin 2008-07-15 15:20 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
george 2008-07-15 15:25 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
mrn 2008-07-15 15:41 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
clarnibass 2008-07-15 17:44 
 Re: C3 or C4  
Tobin 2008-07-15 18:07 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
davidsampson 2008-07-15 19:14 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
Ed Palanker 2008-07-16 03:20 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
clarnibass 2008-07-16 04:57 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
timg 2008-07-16 21:28 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
Ed Palanker 2008-07-17 02:25 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
John25 2008-07-17 21:07 
 Re: C3 or C4  new
John25 2008-07-17 21:11 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org