Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 K 622 Discrepancy?
Author: John Stackpole 
Date:   2005-01-08 13:13

My son, an amateur pianist, and I attemped to play an arrangement of K 622, for Piano & Bb clarinet, and discovered that, in the third measure from the last of the Adagio, the clarinet line printed (and transcribed) in the piano accompaniment book differed from the solo clarinet pages. (There may have been other differences but that's as far as we got.)

Is this sort of thing unusual? Or was Harry Bettoney, the arranger (according to the cover of the book, although the Adagio was marked as arranged by "A.E. Harris") just nodding when he put the piece together?

The copyright notice is 1945, Cundy-Bettoney Co, Boston

JDS

Reply To Message
 
 Re: K 622 Discrepancy?
Author: CPW 
Date:   2005-01-08 13:32

DR LEESON STAT TO THE ER!!!

Reply To Message
 
 Re: K 622 Discrepancy?
Author: Mark Charette 
Date:   2005-01-08 13:58

The best online reference to published editions I know of, incuding errata, is at:

http://www.clarinet.org/fests/1998/Koons.asp

Reply To Message
 
 Re: K 622 Discrepancy?
Author: GBK 
Date:   2005-01-08 14:46

Since many modern editions now attempt to reconstruct the basset clarinet version of K.622, the 1945 Cundy-Bettoney edition is now considered quite outdated by today's standards.

There are also a few misprints in notes and phrasing which need correction.

Use the link cited by Mark C to choose an edition which is more up to date ...GBK

Reply To Message
 
 Re: K 622 Discrepancy?
Author: clarinetist04 
Date:   2005-01-09 05:22

Generally, I have seen this in several of the major publishers' versions of clarinet standards. I'm sure many of you have seen the mistake in the Weber concerto II third movement published by International. The end of the introduction (descending thirds) is incorrect in the clarient part (actually it's completely different than the piano score) but correct in the piano part. I've also seen this in the first concerto (Weber), a piece by Bartok (Masters), and a few others. So the short answer is yeah, this is pretty common. My best guess is that it's a way to bypass copyright (change it so you can say it's different?) but I don't really have a clue...maybe you're right...not enough coffee.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: K 622 Discrepancy?
Author: donald 
Date:   2005-01-10 03:37

the Peters edition of the Mozart Adagio mvt has an extra beat in the Piano part in one bar.....

Reply To Message
 
 Re: K 622 Discrepancy?
Author: clarinetist04 
Date:   2005-01-11 00:46

I went back and looked at my copy of the piece and low and behold I have the Cundy-Bettony version. The clarinet part is correct.

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org