Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Judging
Author: Elizabeth 
Date:   2004-10-24 17:18

For those musical judges out there... What's process/thoughts are going through your head while listening to a recorded piece? Do you take in consideration the stupid and accidental mistakes made?

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Judging
Author: EEBaum 
Date:   2004-10-24 17:59

I'm not a judge, but I know the first thing I'd listen for is a player who can get past the notes and play the music. I hear so many performers these days that seem to be at war with the piece.

For a recording, though, if there are lots of stupid and accidental mistakes, I might hope to do another take...

-Alex
www.mostlydifferent.com

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Judging
Author: GBK 
Date:   2004-10-24 18:36

> What's process/thoughts are going through your head
> while listening to a recorded piece?
> Do you take in consideration the stupid and
> accidental mistakes made?


When judging, I can tell if a mistake is a finger slip or just poor preparation.

However, if a student submits a recording with "studid or accidental mistakes" (your words), it tells me either:

1. The selected piece(s) may be too difficult for him/her.
2. Their technique is insufficient.
3. They don't care enough to take the time to make an acceptable recording.
4. All of the above

...GBK



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Judging
Author: DavidBlumberg 
Date:   2004-10-24 21:23

Stupid and Accidental Mistakes don't cut it.


Re-record it or just don't enter.



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Judging
Author: Markus Wenninger 
Date:   2004-10-25 12:09

Those so-called mistakes are, to me, most often the most interesting moments, where predictability and eveness get warped. Yes, Alex, as O. Coleman said, let´s play the music and not the background - though there´s quite several handfuls of fascinating 'backgrounds' at that, so to say.
Markus

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Judging
Author: Mark Charette 
Date:   2004-10-25 12:14

Markus Wenninger wrote:

> Those so-called mistakes are, to me, most often the most
> interesting moments, where predictability and eveness get
> warped.

That's fine, but it's not what this thread is about, unless you are the judge, and if you have been the judge where mistakes are evaluated for their inherent "worthiness" (whatever that means - after all, this is a thread about judging, not anything else), would you care to discuss how in fact you did judge them?

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Judging
Author: DavidBlumberg 
Date:   2004-10-25 12:57

I'll never forget at the ICA Competition in Belguim (1993) Deplus gave a finalist I was coaching a 1 out of 5 on Dynamics and Incenzo gave the same student a 5 out of 5 on Dynamics.

Incenzo loved it, Deplus hated it.



btw - I have DePlus Vandoren poster framed and hanging in my studio



Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org