Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 440 vs. 442
Author: Bob Schwab 
Date:   2003-05-22 23:26

OK. I'm ignorant. What's up with mouthpieces that play either 440hz or 442hz? Why would I want a 442hz mouthpiece?

Reply To Message
 
 Re: 440 vs. 442
Author: sfalexi 
Date:   2003-05-23 00:47

Probably if you played in europe. I personally would look at one if for some reason I always seem to play a little flat, but would only try it if I didn't have the money for a new mouthpiece AND barrel and if I needed a new mouthpiece anyway. I'd look into them. It's easier to make yourself play flatter by pulling out, but if the barrels all the way in, what can you do? Well I know what I'd do. A shorter barrel, or a higher pitched mouthpiece.

Alexi

US Army Japan Band

Reply To Message
 
 Re: 440 vs. 442
Author: cyso_clarinetist 
Date:   2003-05-23 13:26

442 is become more of a choice out there. Many many conservatories and major orchestra's are tunning higher. There is some debate to why and if it is really a wise move. Here in Chicago it's about half and half, the CSO tunes higher, sometimes you find a piano is at 442 or 440 or even 444. Personally I love playing at 442. It's much more comfortable though for some reason to play with a really dark tone at that pitch level seems to get more difficult.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: 440 vs. 442
Author: sfalexi 
Date:   2003-05-23 22:25

cyso_clarinetist wrote:

> 442 is become more of a choice out there. Many many
> conservatories and major orchestra's are tunning higher. There
> is some debate to why and if it is really a wise move. Here in
> Chicago it's about half and half, the CSO tunes higher,
> sometimes you find a piano is at 442 or 440 or even 444.
> Personally I love playing at 442. It's much more comfortable
> though for some reason to play with a really dark tone at that
> pitch level seems to get more difficult.

I think, in general, the higher the pitch, the harder it is to achieve a darker tone. Compare similar instruments. A tenor vs alto or soprano sax, an Bb clarinet vs a C clarinet, vs the Eb clarinet, flute vs piccalo, etc. So it seems to be a general pattern/theme to this.

Alexi

US Army Japan Band

Reply To Message
 
 Re: 440 vs. 442
Author: Liquorice 
Date:   2003-05-24 08:12

What about the dark sounding Viennese players, who tune to A=446?!

Reply To Message
 
 Re: 440 vs. 442
Author: Stéphane 
Date:   2003-05-24 15:38

True, but then I guess the german bore has more to do with the darkness of the sound than the pitch.

Stéphane.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: 440 vs. 442
Author: Bob Schwab 
Date:   2003-05-24 15:50

But why would anyone want to tune using a different standard in the first place? What's wrong with 440hz?

Reply To Message
 
 Re: 440 vs. 442
Author: GBK 
Date:   2003-05-24 16:07

Bob...Interesting reading:

http://idrs.colorado.edu/Publications/DR/DR6.1/rising.html ...GBK



Reply To Message
 
 Re: 440 vs. 442
Author: D Dow 
Date:   2003-05-24 18:35

I truly doubt the size of the bore of the clarinet has much to do with the darkness of the tone of the instrument or not.

I tend to think the mouthpiece and the way the player blows has the greatess effect on how the instrument sounds...

Also I have seen a number of players mean different things by dark bright etc. Focus and colour of tone are a number of different things...

The Vienna clarinets sure do sound dark, and yet they tune really high.

When I saw Boulez conduct Mahler 6 I found the the whole Vienna Phil wind secton to have a "dark" covered tone.

David Dow

Reply To Message
 
 Re: 440 vs. 442
Author: Bob Schwab 
Date:   2003-05-24 21:18

GBK.... Read the article.... Thank you. Now I understand.

Bob Schwab


The human brain, after all, is just a computer made of meat.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: 440 vs. 442
Author: Don Berger 
Date:   2003-05-24 21:33

Great observation!, Bob S ! I measure my mps, from tip to end of body, NOT tenon. Several vary from 70 to 73 mm, and in length only will cause diffs in pitch!! Don

Thanx, Mark, Don

Reply To Message
 
 Re: 440 vs. 442
Author: Synonymous Botch 
Date:   2003-05-24 22:11

The human brain, is mostly made of what amounts to anti-freeze.

The largest constituents (proteins, fats, gristle, old baseball stats) are fatty acids and other lipids on the working surfaces that pass neurotransmitters.

The brain is far more efficient as a radiator of excess heat than in processing higher cognitive functions (measure the amount of calories consumed vs. thermal output)...

Not so much a computer as a regulatory system enclosing a fundamental program that is part of the BiOS.

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org