Woodwind.OrgThe Fingering ForumThe C4 standard

 
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 RE: Clarinet vs Saxaphone
Author: hello how are you and how do y 
Date:   2003-11-11 13:27

The clarinet is a very good instrument to start with. Thats how I started out. My teacher told me that the sax is often to heavy and kids often drop out. So if you ask me I would say that he should start with the clarinet.Thats not the only thing he will also know how to play two instruments.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Clarinet vs Saxaphone
Author: Theboy_2 
Date:   2003-11-11 16:51

who are you talking about? you or someone that is a beginner musicain? both instruments are fine. sax can be used in concert band and jazz band. clarinet can be used in concert band, but thanks to saxophones, it isn't really accepted into the jazz circle to often anymore. it's also a matter of opinion, whichever the person would like to play. saxophones can be heavy to younger kids, so an alto would be a best bet to start out, it's small, and the keys aren't spread out to far. clarinet, small, keys aren't spread apart, easy to handle, offers a challenge to those who want to be very good on that instrument. hope this helps.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Clarinet vs Saxaphone
Author: SAX Chick 
Date:   2003-11-24 01:03

I would say go with Sax because it is regularly not heavy if you have the neck strap adjusted. From experience you should just let him choose or he may drop out if you choose it for him. **Saxophone** ;) I started out with sax and completly love it... It's the perfect instrument for Jazz band...

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Clarinet vs Saxaphone
Author: Bryan 
Date:   2003-12-16 22:27

Umm...HEAVY? it's not heave at all...and crying outloud, they supposed 2 have neckstraps to PREVENT dropping it. But actually, the sax is better to start off for various reasons:
1. It is SUPPOSED to have a neckstrap, which prevents you from dropping it
2. You have a VERY simple embochure (just an O shape)
3. Less squeeking (previous experience from beginning band, for every sax squeek, there were 8 clarinet squeeks)
4. Easier to double-toungue on

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Clarinet vs Saxaphone
Author: bariplayr 
Date:   2004-01-25 20:35

I disagree I just switched from clairnet to Baritone Saxaphone and I enjoy the Bari a lot more than clairnet, but its tru it is quite heavy.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Clarinet vs Saxaphone
Author: SopiAliBari 
Date:   2004-02-09 13:23

I can't really say the sax is heavy. I play the baritone for the Fife youth jazz orchestra and was carrying it up and down 4 flights of stairs every week. And thats the only time I found it heavy, but if your playing it as long as the neck straps adjusted correctly then you would have no problem. Its the same for all instruments.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Clarinet vs Saxaphone (clarinet)
Author: Gecko_girl 
Date:   2004-05-04 04:31

I agree.
I think the clarinet is much easier to start with.
I am still playing it now, and think it is a great instrument to play.
Also, u dont have to switch to sax. If u think aboout Benny Goodman, about the best clarinetest ever (if i may say so), he played clarinet like his whole life!
thats my opinion, bye!

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org