Author: Fuzzy
Date: 2021-05-03 23:22
I think the idea that we are "guests" and are not entitled to any specific service or product is being lost...whether walking into a store, or wanting to be part of an ensemble. The rules of the host should be strictly followed. The only other option is to abstain. I'm confused by this (somewhat, but-not-totally, new) belief that others should be forced to accommodate "me."
Having said that, I do believe that the conflicting and imprecise data being presented to the populace from the "experts" only exacerbates the issue, and forces folks into one "camp" or another. Where the science is lacking, folks get sucked into a belief system.
My concern with bell covers is: we know that the virus doesn't transfer so much from surfaces as it does via aerosol (at least we think we know this). However, have any studies been performed pertaining to using a cloth to control such aerosols, and then handling that cloth, or storing it and reusing it? Are bell cloths simply changing the transmission method instead of reducing the transmission? The aerosol/bell cover study was very controlled and seems difficult to apply to real-world application due to the incredible number of variables which couldn't be included in the study. Again, to me, it seems this leaves us yet another study into which we might fall into beliefs or camps. Not all things that "make sense" at face value end up panning out when tested or put into practice.
Fuzzy
;^)>>>
|
|
The Clarinet BBoard
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
