Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Previous Message  |  Next Message 
 Re: Sham products?
Author: seabreeze 
Date:   2020-12-01 23:48

If we wanted to harshly apply strict logic and courtroom level proof, then virtually every advertiser's claims for their clarinet-related product would have to be thrown out of court as a sham. Ads don't describe so much as lure or attract attention. Everybody promises better intonation, smoother intervals, wider dynamic control, better blend, support of a more personal sound, or whatever will drawn attention to the product. It's then left up to the player to decide the attributes of the product for themselves.

There are reasons beyond advertising hype that many professionals have chosen certain equipment, for example clarinet barrels made by Moening, or Chadash, or Marc Jacobi, or Backun, or the Icon Buffet models. Few players would find the sound or response of a typical Backun "fat-boy" barrel to be exactly the same as that of a Chadash or an Icon gold. The differences are hard to put into words, which at best are only metaphors for sound, but most players would find that Backun to be less vibrant and less narrowly focused than the Chadash or Icon. The Backun would mirror the overall tendencies of Backun clarinets and the Chadash and Icon would mirror the the tendencies of the classic Buffet R13. Some players would prefer what the Backun offers, some would go for the Chadash or Icon and others would like neither. I believe these differences would show up on an oscilloscope but they would still be quite subtle and more apparent to the player than to listeners. Of course there are innumerable barrels on the market and many of them probably don't add anything of value to performance.

Recently Brad Behn released two different adjustable swivel-type barrels. He experimented with an all rubber one and a rubber one with a metal turning plate. He decided to offer both to give players a choice. The all rubber one seems to have a warmer more intimate sound and the partly metallic one is more powerful and assertive. Is this difference purely imaginary? A player could try both and come to their own conclusions. But I doubt either barrel could be described as a "sham."



Post Edited (2020-12-02 04:37)

 Reply To Message  |  Avail. Forums  |  Flat View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 

 Topics Author  Date
 Sham products?  new
crvsp 2020-12-01 23:18 
 Re: Sham products?  
seabreeze 2020-12-01 23:48 
 Re: Sham products?  new
Paul Aviles 2020-12-02 00:09 
 Re: Sham products?  new
donald 2020-12-02 01:04 
 Re: Sham products?  new
Paul Aviles 2020-12-02 03:04 
 Re: Sham products?  new
Tom H 2020-12-02 08:49 
 Re: Sham products?  new
crvsp 2020-12-02 12:07 
 Re: Sham products?  new
Bennett 2020-12-02 22:49 
 Re: Sham products?  new
Chris P 2020-12-03 13:42 
 Re: Sham products?  new
donald 2020-12-04 01:28 
 Re: Sham products?  new
donald 2020-12-04 04:50 
 Re: Sham products?  new
Tony Pay 2020-12-04 21:34 
 Re: Sham products?  new
AndyW 2020-12-04 21:49 
 Re: Sham products?  new
Mark Charette 2020-12-04 22:30 
 Re: Sham products?  new
Tony Pay 2020-12-06 21:46 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org