Author: Bob Barnhart ★2017
Date: 2011-01-26 02:44
I played on the M13 Lyre for a couple of years and switched to the M30 which I also played for several years. I haven't compared the numbers, but since both mouthpieces played nearly the same reeds (e.g., "lighter" VD V12 #4s), I suspect that the facing curve on the M30 may approximate a "scaled-up" version of the curve on the M13 Lyre (i.e., more open with a correspondingly longer facing). Personally, I love this free-blowing mouthpiece for its dark/round tone quality and flexibility. Oddly , nearly everyone non-clarinettist I ask about the sound complains that it is too dark, lacking enough color/life. It does seem to require a lot of air and (for some) its flexibility may make it a bit difficult to control.
I would also recommend trying the M30 Lyre which on paper is only marginally different (i.e., 1.13mm vs 1.15mm tip opening). Based on how it plays, I suspect that it has a slightly shorter lay than the M30. However, these changes make for a mouthpiece with a more focused, colorful sound that is easier to control than the M30 and sounds much nicer than even the 5RV Lyre. Interestingly, (for me and others with whom I've spoken) it seems to like a bit softer reed (e.g., V12 3 1/2 instead of 4).
Both of these mouthpieces (as well as the B40 Lyre that I currently play) have noticeably wider side/tip rails than most mouthpieces. Since I have a very slow tongue, I won't disagree with Paul's comment concerning the effect this may have on articulation speed, although it doesn't seem to bother Jon Manasse! However, I find all these mouthpieces to be quite responsive in all other respects.
One drawback that I have noticed: for me, both the M30 and M30 Lyre can sometimes play a bit flat, necessitating the use of a shorter barrel.
I hope this helps.
Bob Barnhart
|
|
The Clarinet BBoard
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
