The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: Tobin
Date: 2008-05-29 12:12
If "motion capture" can be used to generate ever increasingly accurate digital images....then this is probably a piece of cake.
James
Gnothi Seauton
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: woody
Date: 2008-05-29 13:30
Fantastic!
Just like a British Army Bandmaster!!! they're all robots too! ;-)
Ben
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Paul Aviles
Date: 2008-05-29 22:46
I did not have access to audio, but I see the little robot conduct in three and the printed music superimposed on the screen for a moment is in four.
Stupid machines.
..............Paul Aviles
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: FrankM
Date: 2008-05-29 23:00
His downbeat is a heck of a lot clearer than 99% of the conductors I've played for!
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: crnichols
Date: 2008-05-29 23:25
He was "programmed" to conduct like Charles Dutoit. I don't think it worked right...
Also, I recall reading a news article that said the robot was rigid with it's programming. This resulted in train wrecks in some of the rehearsals, as the machine lacks the ability to "go with the flow" of the ensemble like an excellent human conductor.
However, he could probably conduct ceremonies for military bands. Usually we barely looked at the conductor for those. We just need to get him in some fatigues, combat boots and a beret and we'd be set!
Christopher Nichols, D.M.A.
Assistant Professor of Clarinet
University of Delaware
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Chelle
Date: 2008-05-30 00:48
Looks like not much more than an over-priced metronome.
-Chelle
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Ryder
Date: 2008-05-31 06:30
"Looks like not much more than an over-priced metronome.
-Chelle"
Yea! One that can grab me a drink too!
Can it make reeds?
____________________
Ryder Naymik
San Antonio, Texas
"We pracice the way we want to perform, that way when we perform it's just like we practiced"
Post Edited (2008-05-31 06:31)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
|