 The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: sanya
Date: 2006-06-19 15:18
Summer is here -- or, rather, will be after my last three finals, and then yes, high school is finally over for good! -- and days of practicing and improvement, hopefully, lie before me. What's the difference between this book: http://sheetmusicplus.com/store/smp_detail.html?cart=33596645775336517&type=rec&item=96439
and this book: http://sheetmusicplus.com/store/smp_detail.html?cart=33596645775336517&type=rec&item=96417
Thanks in advance. !
Post Edited (2006-06-19 15:19)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Paul Aviles
Date: 2006-06-19 15:46
45 cents.
The Rose 40 studies are just a bit more rudimental but conain some key exercises that we should all know by heart (more or less) such as number one (essential slow, conectivity study and number three (used by the likes of Clark Brody for LOUD/soft practice - first 18 bars only).
Rose 32 continue the key ingredients for good orchestral playing.
Note: Marcellus stressed studying in sequence, starting with the two Forty Studies books and moving on to the 32 Studies.
ALL ESSENTIAL......... A MUST!!!!
..........Paul Aviles
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Tony Pay ★2017
Date: 2006-06-19 16:16
Well, I never played a Rose Etude in my life.
Must be where I've been going wrong.
Tony
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: David Peacham
Date: 2006-06-19 17:12
I recall reading in this pages that an electronic tuner is a must for the young student. I bet Tony didn't have one of those either. But he's done OK, considering.
-----------
If there are so many people on this board unwilling or unable to have a civil and balanced discussion about important issues, then I shan't bother to post here any more.
To the great relief of many of you, no doubt.
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Tony Pay ★2017
Date: 2006-06-19 17:26
David Peacham wrote:
>> I recall reading in this pages that an electronic tuner is a must for the young student. I bet Tony didn't have one of those either.>>
Funnily enough, David, I must have been one of the first to have one, in the early 70s. It was a heavy wooden box, around 8x6x6 inches, with a 12 position switch and a twirly wheel calibrated in cents. It didn't listen, only buzz.
What it showed me was how useful (in one sense) and how useless (in another sense) such things are. I drove my orchestral colleagues crazy with it for a few days.
Tony
Post Edited (2006-06-19 17:29)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Tony Pay ★2017
Date: 2006-06-19 21:26
BTW, lest you think I'm dissing Rose Etudes, nothing could be farther from my intentions.
The point is rather: NOTHING is necessary -- or sufficient:-)
(That last both for the mathematicians and for the real musicians.)
Tony
Post Edited (2006-06-19 21:42)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
 |
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
