Author: Tony Pay ★2017
Date: 2014-06-26 14:25
>> If we want sound scholarship, a publisher like Henle would have to get his hands on the original manuscript and do the necessary work. For the moment, I imagine this isn't possible for legal reasons.>>
The point, Ruben is: I've posted photocopies of those disputed bars in Poulenc's manuscript here – see above. Chester's latest edition matches those bars – I think that despite some small sillinesses, that edition makes another publisher's involvement redundant.
What more do I need to do to counter, here, people who think that Cuper is right?
Or who trust the impeccable scholarship of 'The Clarinet'?-^)
Tony
|
|