Author: Mark Charette
Date: 2002-06-19 16:28
Well, it <b>was</b> a newspaper report, not something published in <i>Nature</i> (at least not yet), so we don't really know anything about the realities of the study. There may have been a control group, but unfortunately just because someone writes for the Science section of a newspaper doesn't mean they're qualified to write for the Science section ...
Unfortunately I'm now seeing that in the new, revised, (dumbed-down for the last 6 or 7 years) <i>Scientific American</i> biographical sketches.
|
|