Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Buffet age revisited
Author: jez 
Date:   2002-06-14 16:29

Having established the age of the instrument I was enquiring about (thanks Mark) as made in 1976, could I extend the query.
It belongs to my partner/girfriend, whatever you say and, not being very fond of Buffets I'd never tried it 'til recently. When I did I was struck by the fact that I prefer it to any modern Buffet I've tried.
What was the best period for Buffet manufacture? I've read lots of people saying they prefer their older ones. Is there a good vintage year to look out for? Why the difference? Are their wood supplies less well seasoned, or have their methods changed? Do other makers have good and bad years?
Thoughts and experiences welcome
jez

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Buffet age revisited
Author: Mark Charette 
Date:   2002-06-14 16:56

Many professionals are saying that today's Buffets are the best ever produced. Your taste may be for others, though ...

Check Clark Fobes' article here on Woodwind.Org in the Equipment section and check Clark's site itself for some clues on which batches were similar.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Buffet age revisited
Author: jez 
Date:   2002-06-14 17:03

Can't find it in 'equipment'

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Buffet age revisited
Author: Mark Charette 
Date:   2002-06-14 17:13

http://www.woodwind.org/clarinet/Equipment/Intonation.html

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Buffet age revisited
Author: jez 
Date:   2002-06-14 17:17

Thanks Mark, .......... very interesting

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Buffet age revisited
Author: GBK 
Date:   2002-06-15 05:17

jez...Many regulars on this board happen to own Buffets from the mid to late 1960's. Of all my Buffets, there is something a little different about the instruments from that era. Whether it was the quality/aging of the wood, or just the overall workmanship at that time, I find myself always going back to that series of instruments as my reference point.

Here is a good thread to read why this was discussed in depth by many 60's Buffet owners:

http://www.woodwind.org/clarinet/BBoard/read.html?f=1&i=60006&t=59983

Unfortunately, instruments from that era are harder and harder to find. If you do see one, grab it. If you pass, call me...GBK

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Buffet age revisited
Author: natalie 
Date:   2002-06-15 10:35

well, i have recently purchased a new buffet R13, and i would't choose anything else. You have to take into account that older instruments, especially if they have not been well maintained can have alot of problems. But it is up to you wether you prefer a new or old istrument. i have heard people years ago say that they personally preferred older instruments.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Buffet age revisited
Author: Dee 
Date:   2002-06-15 11:21

Well I've read that Buffet made design changes over the years without changing the model number. Perhaps it is the differences caused by these changes that people notice and some have a preference for the resulting characteristic. If that is the case, then there is no "better" just different. Like some people prefer one model or brand over another.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Buffet age revisited
Author: Bob 
Date:   2002-06-15 11:29

I find the comments about good "old" Buffets interesting when comparing them to the comments about "blown out" horns.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Buffet age revisited
Author: DLE 
Date:   2002-06-15 23:08

The problem I have with so many clarinettists playing the same type of instrument (Buffet R13), is the lack of variation in this instrument in general, making it sound rather boring in recitals. That is one of the reasons why I play an Leblanc Opus 'B-flat' and 'A' set. People have complimented me in the past for my 'sweeter tone' (Though my technique for fingering is another matter entirely...) One of the things I listen out for in other instruments is the difference in tone quality and technique. Having everyone play on the same type of clarinet is more than boring, it's heartbrakingly sad in my opinion.
Sorry if this was off the topic, but I thought it was best to raise my opinion here, as it does go against the current trend.
DLE.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Buffet age revisited
Author: Brenda Siewert 
Date:   2002-06-16 14:57

I would have to agree with Mark that the new ones lately have been far superior to the 80's and early 90's models. They have been turning out some great R-13s and Festivals.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Buffet age revisited
Author: Ken Shaw 
Date:   2002-06-17 15:13

jez -

According to Kalmen Opperman (who I think knows more than anybody about the R-13), the instruments with serial numbers between 90,000 and 200,000 were very good. There was a not-so-good period from the low-200,000s through mid-300,000s. The current series, over 400,000 is once again very good.

My Bb is 134,518, and my A is 126,161. I like them both better than any of the newer R-13s I've tried, but I recently played a very fine new RC Greenline.

Best regards.

Ken Shaw

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org