Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Polycylindrical vs. Conical (WHY???)
Author: David Pegel 
Date:   2002-04-04 03:04

I've researched this and still don't have a very secure answer to this. (I'm always asking myself "why".) But how is there a difference between polycylindrical and conical? They both expand in a similar manner, and I can't even tell the difference when I look down a poly bore and a conical bore. Even if it's different at a microscopic level, I fail to see WHY that would matter... as they are both expanding as they go further down, so the air should even in a circular motion follow a similar "slipstream"

Am I missing something important here, or am I just utterly clueless?? I've taken absolutely no physics whatsoever so I can't even try to compare scientifically.

May there's a diagram out there of a poly bore vs. conical bore. Can anybody direct me to one, or try to explain it in small words I'll be sure to understand? I AM still in high school, after all.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Polycylindrical vs. Conical (WHY???)
Author: ken 
Date:   2002-04-04 03:53

Hi David,

Go to www.sfoxclarinets.com

You'll find a fairly short, layman-friendly article on clarinet acoustics which touches on polyc./comical clarinet bores.

That typo is too good to delete!

Ken

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Polycylindrical vs. Conical (WHY???)
Author: madvax 
Date:   2002-04-04 05:38


Direct link to the Fox article:

http://www.sfoxclarinets.com/baclac_art.htm

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Polycylindrical vs. Conical (WHY???)
Author: IHL 
Date:   2002-04-04 06:15

heheh... comical bores.

note: not nitpicking your spelling, I just found it an amusing typo :)

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Polycylindrical vs. Conical (WHY???)
Author: Don Poulsen 
Date:   2002-04-04 12:28

I would guess that a comical bore is someone who consistently, and persistently, tells old, stale jokes. (Either that or the inside of a saxophone.)

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Polycylindrical vs. Conical (WHY???)
Author: IHL 
Date:   2002-04-05 00:23

kind of an oxymoron though, isnt it?

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Polycylindrical vs. Conical (WHY???)
Author: Don Berger 
Date:   2002-04-05 18:50

Back to the bore question, David, we had a bore type-configuration discussion just last week [search the Phorum}. I agree that the diff. between "truly-conical" and polycyl., with such [usually]minimal enlargement of the top of the UJ, is scarcely detectable in playing diffs. [to me], also hard even to measure, I leave it to the [opinions of] the real pros. There prob. is some improvement in the pitch accuracy of the twelths [clarion register to me] but again hard to "pinpoint". I just assume the makers know what they are doing, and reserve the right to make my choice of horns. Don

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org