The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: Peter
Date: 2001-12-08 16:18
As Ken (and others) agreed it is "poly-cylindrical."
All, from mathematical, engineering and a literary English perspectives, each individual cylinder cut into the bore would have to be a cone for it to be "polyconical," meaning many cones.
As the design (purportedly) is, in fact, measurably cylindrical in all its individual steps, then it is, poly-cylindrical, regardless of how it may theoretically "act," ie.: as Ken said: "...the bore probably acts as a cone/reverse cone acoustically."
|
|
|
Marcia Nottle |
2001-12-06 20:43 |
|
Douglas |
2001-12-06 21:55 |
|
Fred |
2001-12-07 01:54 |
|
sarah |
2001-12-07 02:03 |
|
William Hughes |
2001-12-07 03:51 |
|
Matt Locker |
2001-12-07 13:41 |
|
Ken Shaw |
2001-12-07 14:23 |
|
Don Berger |
2001-12-07 17:29 |
|
Peter |
2001-12-08 16:18 |
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
|