Author: Tony Pay ★2017
Date: 2016-02-13 04:36
Ned wrote:
>> The responses that correspondents post in reply to ''self agrandising idiots'', would best be countered by facts alone, AND less inflammatory and insulting turns of phrase. >>
Indeed, and I have always tried to do so, at least to begin with.
It seems, though, that facts aren't sufficient for some people; and there is no adequate moderation to support those facts (as there would be in 'a peer reviewed journal').
So instead of responding with ridicule, as I have sometimes done previously, I will try to walk away.
But there is a loss: there is just that much more unchallenged crap here.
So in a way, I disagree with your 'best'. Read:
http://test.woodwind.org/Databases/lookup.php/Klarinet/2001/06/000034.txt
Tony
Post Edited (2016-02-13 17:27)
|
|