Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: fromsfca 
Date:   2016-02-05 05:41

So, I've been a die hard Selmer fan; 2 bass clarinets, as well as a number of soprano clarinets. Mostly old stuff; a '37 Balanced Tone, a '71 S1 and my current horn; a "55 full Boehm Centered Tone (range down to Eb and yeah, I use it...fits beautifully in Creole Love Call).

I play shows and a lot jazz and swing...hence the big bore horns.

I'd been reading about the Leblanc vs Buffet wars (I'm from the 60s, peace and love, man)...and came across a LeBlanc Opus, reworked by John Parrete, so I had confidence leaks, intonation other quirks were eradicated.

Horn plays great; and in an initial face to face comparison, I find the tone equal (I play a Portnoy BP02 I've had for over 40 years), but am very impressed by the playability of the LeBlanc. As a doubler who has to keep any number of chops on any number of horns, I find the LeBlanc a very easy blowing horn, yet, still full of tone and character.

I've only just started playing on it...but so far, am very impressed.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: Ursa 
Date:   2016-02-05 14:00

Ah, relax--it's perfectly OK to love more than one marque of clarinet. I also play shows, big band, and beer tent gigs; accordingly, the big-bore instruments of yesteryear are of special interest to me, too.

In my clarinet rotation, you'll find Backun, Boosey & Hawkes, Conn, Noblet, Pan American, Pruefer, and Ridenour instruments. The Leblanc LL and Selmer Centered Tone are on my wish list.



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: TAS 
Date:   2016-02-05 20:56

I use a Buffet R13 (I have two, vintage 1959 and 1962).

When I played lots of jazz at clubs, I used a Leblanc LL7. I sold it many years ago It was a cool instrument and extremely well constructed. The person who bought it was told it had a 90 proof bore from my club drinking and playing days.

Play what you like - and your audience likes.

TAS

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: Clarineteer 
Date:   2016-02-05 20:58

I agree. Those Vintage R13's from the late fifties and sixties are super.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: fromsfca 
Date:   2016-02-05 21:01

Now I know why I have to change pads so often...the alcohol dries them out

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: Chris P 
Date:   2016-02-05 21:11

My main clarinets are old Selmers (Eb, Bb and A), but I do own a few Buffets (Eb, basset horn and bass and a cracked full Boehm R13) and a couple of Yamahas (YCL-24 and an alto). And a Masspacher (Couesnon) C clarinet.

I've owned a Leblanc LL and some B&H clarinets as well, so not one to stick to one make and one make only.

There are many players that don't have matching Bb/A sets - not just different models, but by totally different makes as they've found the same model A clarinet isn't what they like (maybe too resistant or for a variety of other reasons) and have found the ideal A clarinet from another maker.

Former oboe finisher
Howarth of London
1998 - 2010

The opinions I express are my own.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: Johan H Nilsson 
Date:   2016-02-06 00:36

I "discovered" Leblanc when I tested clarinets in a shop. I played topline Buffets and then the shopkeeper thought I should test a second-hand Leblanc Concerto and talked well about the brand. I had no previous experience but found out it played as good over the register break as the Buffet Divine I tested, and better than the RC Prestige.

The Selmer clarinet that is most similar to the Opus must be the Privilege. If you have to play at A=440 the Opus is a better choice. The Privilege comes only in a 442 version and the tuning breaks down when you pull the barrel. The "compromise" 441 Seles Presence or the 440 versions of the Recital or Signature are better choices in that situation.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: MarlboroughMan 
Date:   2016-02-06 00:55

I play a Selmer CT on most gigs. But I also have a set of 1951 Fritz Wurlitzer Reform Boehms I like to bust out occasionally. If I had a Pete Fountain model Leblanc, I'd probably play that too. Anyone wishing to donate one to my cause, please email me.

Play what you dig.


Eric

******************************
The Jazz Clarinet
http://thejazzclarinet.blogspot.com/

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: Chris P 
Date:   2016-02-06 05:44
Attachment:  earlyct 001.JPG (676k)
Attachment:  earlyct 002.JPG (675k)
Attachment:  earlyct 003.JPG (692k)
Attachment:  earlyct 004.JPG (685k)

The earliest CT I've owned (which had a very slightly different 'Centered Tone' logo on the top joint compared to my P, Q and R series ones) was an N series with all original joints and large hexagonal speaker bush. The serial number was in the N84xx region. The top joint had cracked but had been pinned instead of being transplanted.

Former oboe finisher
Howarth of London
1998 - 2010

The opinions I express are my own.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: Chris P 
Date:   2016-02-06 05:54

Where did the reply above my previous one with photos of the other CT go?

Former oboe finisher
Howarth of London
1998 - 2010

The opinions I express are my own.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: KenJarczyk 
Date:   2016-02-06 06:15
Attachment:  image.jpeg (92k)
Attachment:  image.jpeg (107k)
Attachment:  image.jpeg (1382k)
Attachment:  image.jpeg (81k)
Attachment:  image.jpeg (92k)

Well, let's try this from a different angle! Besides various other wonderful clarinets, I also have a pair of "big bore" clarinets, a Leblanc Dynamic H from 1959/1960 (dates right on the cusp) and a Selmer Centered Tone, with an interesting history. The Centered Tone's serial number actually would date it to be a Balanced Tone. Apparently, the Selmer Factory Repair facility in Elkhart replaced the top joint of the clarinet with a brand new Centered Tone upper joint, and stamped the serial number to match the bottom. I found this to be pretty standard practice then, and the bottom joints of the BT and CT are identical.

The Leblanc Dynamic H is quite the wonderful instrument, both for jazz and classical! I enjoy playing it very much, in any genre. It is the clarinet that converted Pete Fountain to Leblanc, and was in later years re-marked as the Pete Fountain Clarinet.

The Centered Tone is also a joy to blow! That great Selmer fingerboard feel! Superb control too, ppp to FFF with effortless ability.

Ken Jarczyk
Woodwinds Specialist
Eb, C, Bb, A & Bass Clarinets
Soprano, Alto, Tenor & Baritone Saxophones
Flute, Alto Flute, Piccolo

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: fromsfca 
Date:   2016-02-06 06:42

Well, wait...the top joint bore on the BT was very different from the CT, especially after the changeover which was what?...1955 or there abouts?

I don't recall if the bottom joint bore changed.

But, apparently, the change was good from what you say.

I specifically looked for an R series CT with the modified bore....I was just lucky to find one with the full Boehm treatment....though I really dig the alternate Eb....including on the LeBlanc Opus.

I compared the CT to my BT and chose the CT...better player. And I had played the BT for over 15 years on Miller band and other gigs needing that clarinet lead.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: Clarineteer 
Date:   2016-02-06 09:40

I was told by an expert that the Opus II was the best Leblanc ever made.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: Johan H Nilsson 
Date:   2016-02-06 13:55

Clarineteer wrote:

> I was told by an expert that the Opus II was the best Leblanc
> ever made.

I agree with your expert, although it is my impression that the Concertos were made with more consistency. The Opus is more free blowing.

Tom Ridenour's design combined with the craftsmanship and know-how in La Couture-Boussey was a good combination.

As I understand, the main part of the income for instrument makers comes from student instruments. Leblanc couldn't compete with Asian instrument makers.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: Chris P 
Date:   2016-02-06 16:04

Concerto II and Opus II keywork was the worst ever made. While it may have been a good design, the execution was terrible. Absolutely no need for those grub screws on the crow's foot and they were always loose, so didn't do the job they were meant to.

The older Leblancs had the best keywork in my opinion.

Former oboe finisher
Howarth of London
1998 - 2010

The opinions I express are my own.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: Johan H Nilsson 
Date:   2016-02-07 14:27

Chris P wrote:

> Absolutely no need for those grub screws on the crow's foot and
> they were always loose, so didn't do the job they were meant
> to.

I can agree on that. The friction of the plastic screw declines over time. Then you have to put some material (grease, teflon tape) into the threads to create friction.

Backun MoBa clarinets have those adjustment screws but with a more robust design.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: gwie 
Date:   2016-02-08 09:22

I had a Leblanc LL full-boehm A clarinet for awhile (with range down to concert C, whoo!), it was a wonderful instrument and I enjoyed it a lot. It just played so differently from my Buffet R-13 at the time, I wanted something similar so I sold it and bought an R-13 A. I kind of miss it!

Also had some random Leblanc A I bought from someone on local classifieds for $200. Apparently they wanted to get rid of what their elementary band teacher called an "awful, out of tune, instrument." I got it overhauled and it served a number of my students as an excellent loaner for youth orchestra, very even scale, excellent keywork, just good all-around. ;)

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: Chris P 
Date:   2016-02-13 02:18
Attachment:  selmerclarinets 001.JPG (792k)

Getting Selmer Mental Over View! (see attachment)

Former oboe finisher
Howarth of London
1998 - 2010

The opinions I express are my own.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: spage 
Date:   2016-02-14 15:05

Nice.... [snarfs photo]. Glances over shoulder at cupboard. Considers. Decides against. Too much hassle and also I don't have anywhere as suitable as that for an overview (nor are some of my online purchases yet in a publically viewable state, and a Marchi system is t'other side of town with my duet partner (who, to balance the books, has a small family of Leblanc LLs).

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Leblanc vs Selmer
Author: mmatisoff 
Date:   2016-08-03 16:26

There's are a few Selmer centered tone clarinets for sale on ebay.

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org