Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Previous Message  |  Next Message 
 Re: Michael Rusinek Ligature
Author: Patrick Sikes 
Date:   2014-02-18 00:20

I realize that, Mr. Palanker. Thus, my inclusions of "extremely trivial" and "wasting your time."

An overly-equipment-obsessed student asked, and I did not know. It seemed to be a "good" design that I was unfamiliar with.

Sometimes, I find slight experimentation, as .01% of any time I spend with my instrument, to be immensely rewarding in the exploration of one's voice, beyond "good" and "bad," or isolationist ideas of "schools" that to me seem ridiculous.

Granted, it's all within ourselves, and our own ears, lungs, mouths, throats (etc.), but in making certain things easier, and certain things more resistant...perhaps we can break our own barriers, and let our own thoughts and feelings shine a bit more. Or, rather, .01% more. But what is art but the fine details?!

I consider it wine-tasting, in the very slight colors able to be obtained. Ridiculous in its own right, but something I personally tend to enjoy...every once in a very long while. And at the very least, it can further allow me to explain my own preferences beyond that of what is told to me from the fount of knowledge by my omniscient teacher.

Useful to win an orchestral chair? Obviously not, but surely there are other objectives for those who pursue our instrument's abilities and limitations.

And while this dancing-about-architecture may simply be more triviality-within-triviality...I think that's the entire nature of this site (which I, again, personally enjoy!)

That being said, I do find (as probably so many of you do) a culture of equipment-in-substitution-of-practice to be eternally hindering our latest generation of players, thus I appreciate the almost compulsory regiment of such postings. Just thought I'd play devil's advocate for a (not) short bit.


_
I'd look forward to hearing Mr. Rusinek in ANY orchestra or setting! To my ears (here we go again with opinions that are so taboo in this site), he has among the most substantial, projecting, colorful, tangible, heartfelt, non-isolationist sounds I have ever heard. And an agility and energy that appeals to not just clarinet-pedagogical ears. Something that I think this world needs much more of. Let the quartering begin! (what a show!)


And many thanks, Dr. Segal, for your detailed answer! :-)

 Reply To Message  |  Avail. Forums  |  Flat View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 

 Topics Author  Date
 Michael Rusinek Ligature  new
Patrick Sikes 2014-02-15 21:21 
 Re: Michael Rusinek Ligature  new
Alseg 2014-02-16 05:28 
 Re: Michael Rusinek Ligature  new
Ed Palanker 2014-02-17 21:17 
 Re: Michael Rusinek Ligature  new
Alseg 2014-02-17 16:57 
 Re: Michael Rusinek Ligature  new
seabreeze 2014-02-18 01:27 
 Re: Michael Rusinek Ligature  new
JamesOrlandoGarcia 2014-02-17 17:29 
 Re: Michael Rusinek Ligature  
Patrick Sikes 2014-02-18 00:20 
 Re: Michael Rusinek Ligature  new
donald 2014-02-17 19:28 
 Re: Michael Rusinek Ligature  new
donald 2014-02-18 04:04 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org