The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: Paula S
Date: 2013-07-26 10:07
Hi All,
Has anyone compared the above two eefers alongside each other? It is quite difficult to find a dealer who has them both in stock outside of London area. The manufacturers specifications don't really say much about the difference between the two. I would be interested to know what the differences are?
Thanks ;-)
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: hartt
Date: 2013-07-28 00:46
I had a 681 and at the time (when Yamaha was still in Grand Rapids) I asked the woodwing man, Mike Lutely, what the difference was between the 681 and 881.
I was told the 681 had insert tonehole while the 881 toneholes were integral.
same silver plate, same bore size, wood grade..
regarding intonation, you will not see/hear a difference.
dennis
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: JJAlbrecht
Date: 2013-07-29 20:19
I haven't tried the 881, but I can heartily recomend the 681 II as an excellent eefer. I began playing one this past year for my concert band, and this clarinet plays beautifully. I would get a decent mouthpiece, however; the Yamaha mouthpices (a plastic 4c) is junk. I use a Brad Behn Artist mouthpiece with mine, and get exellent results with traditional Vandoreen 3.5 eefer reeds.
Jeff
“Everyone discovers their own way of destroying themselves, and some people choose the clarinet.” Kalman Opperman, 1919-2010
"A drummer is a musician's best friend."
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
|