Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Differences: R13 / Leblanc LL
Author: sinkdraiN 
Date:   2008-11-12 15:51

Would anyone with experience on both an R13 and a Leblanc LL please tell me tonal differences between the two.

I know the R13 is usually polycylindrical and the LL is a big cylindrical bore.

I'm sure both horns have their pro's and cons....

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Differences: R13 / Leblanc LL
Author: Caroline Smale 
Date:   2008-11-12 16:12

I have an R13 Bb and pair of Leblancs both from the early 1960's. The Leblanc isn't marked LL but I think its exactly the same and they introduced the LL designation slightly later once they started playing with tapered bores (L7 L200 etc) to differentiate the models.
I find the R13 slightly warmer in sound whereas the LL has a more open "French" sound with a bit more reediness and focus.



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Differences: R13 / Leblanc LL
Author: Chris J 
Date:   2008-11-12 22:37

Some information here!.....

http://test.woodwind.org/clarinet/BBoard/read.html?f=1&i=160700&t=160700

Chris

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Differences: R13 / Leblanc LL
Author: C2thew 
Date:   2008-11-13 05:58

in a nut shell, Leblanc made very consistent, slightly bright, even resistance clarinets that ran a tad on the sharp side when warmed up.

Buffet makes more fuller, colorful, clarinets that have a uniqueness in of their own, however the newer models of R-13's are much more "tame" in a sense that the sound is more even than that of it's predecessor.

Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. they are but improved means to an unimproved end, an end which was already but too easy to arrive as railroads lead to Boston to New York
-Walden; Henry Thoreau

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Differences: R13 / Leblanc LL
Author: stevesklar 
Date:   2008-11-14 13:12

sinkdrain,
I maintain a 60s LL and a 50s R13 as my main players.

They are different in all regards.

ergonomically I prefer the LL. In short (literally) I have small hands and the RH spatula keys area bit of a stretch for me on the R13.

Tonally, I use different primary mpcs for the R13 v LL, as I'm after more of a ringing "french" tone with the R13 than the LL.

I use the LL as my all around clarinet. I dont necessarily consider it a big bore, as that is where my Selmer CT comes into play.

The LL has a bit more spread sound, maybe a bit bigger top to bottom with my setup. Though with a mpc change I feel I can push the R13 a bit more for extended volumes due to the polycylindrical bore .. not scientifically, just my personal opinion.

So the R13 has ring. The LL i get a nice big full woody tone from it.

the balance top to bottom on both are pretty consistent.

intonation prob goes to the LL for consistency, as I believe Leblanc was after improved intonation vs tonal quality (from past readings) for the R13.

==========
Stephen Sklar
My YouTube Channel of Clarinet Information

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org