The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: DLE
Date: 2000-09-27 10:20
Hi. I just want to take the opposite point of view to a comment put on another post about the new 'E-Mail to address' option at the bottom of the Board.
I switched on my E-mail, and found 47 messages on it!!!
For someone who doesn't get enough time to check through them, I was completely horrified by this.
This is just a warning to other users of the board that if you check the box (Tick) at the bottom of the screen, you're likely to be flooded with e-mails about other people.
Just warning you all, this is not a complaint about the new system - I think it's absolutely magnificent.
--will return--
DLE.
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Mark Charette
Date: 2000-09-27 11:11
DLE wrote:
>
> Hi. I just want to take the opposite point of view to a
> comment put on another post about the new 'E-Mail to address'
> option at the bottom of the Board.
> I switched on my E-mail, and found 47 messages on it!!!
> For someone who doesn't get enough time to check through them,
> I was completely horrified by this.
What exactly did you <b>think</b> it would do? It's pretty explicit.
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Rene
Date: 2000-09-27 11:49
47 Mails?
I thought the checkbox mails only replies within the current thread. Never seen a thread here that long.
Rene
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Mark Charette
Date: 2000-09-27 11:53
If you put the checkbox on a bunch of threads ... you're going to start receiving a lot of mail
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Larry
Date: 2000-09-27 18:12
what's the purpose? is it to have a private communication about a bboard matter?
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Mark Charette
Date: 2000-09-27 19:00
Followups on the thread automatically get emailed to you so you don't accidentally miss them
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: DLE
Date: 2000-09-28 12:33
Yes, Mark is right with that last message, and I totally agree with the idea. All I was doing was warning the other users about MISusing this function, and accidentally getting around 30 messages in 3 days.
It's a pain to have to check them all when you're short on time.
For Rene's information, I did have 47 messages that day, but I'm exaggerating a little since half of them were from other souces, and some were old ones that hadn't been deleted. I'd say it was in the region of 15-20 messages in fact.
Sorry for the confusion.
Dave.
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
|