Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Buffet minimum pricing
Author: GBK 
Date:   2007-07-12 17:30

It looks as if, for now, the Buffet minimum pricing policy will hold:

http://mimiran.blogspot.com/2007/06/supreme-court-overturns-ban-on-minimum.html


the NY Times article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/business/28cnd-bizcourt.html?ex=1340769600&en=0b4c106d96a846ae&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

...GBK

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Buffet minimum pricing
Author: BassetHorn 
Date:   2007-07-12 18:43

Buffet seems to believe that demand for its clarinets is inelastic, like gasoline.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Buffet minimum pricing
Author: C2thew 
Date:   2007-07-12 19:00

Supply and demand. at that price level, more competition will enter the market and hopefully people will finally realize there ARE alternatives to buffet, though their production is still very good.

Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. they are but improved means to an unimproved end, an end which was already but too easy to arrive as railroads lead to Boston to New York
-Walden; Henry Thoreau

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Buffet minimum pricing
Author: Ken Shaw 2017
Date:   2007-07-12 19:54

I don my lawyer's hat.

The Sherman Antitrust Act outlaws "restraint of trade," which the Supreme Court quickly construed to mean "UNREASONABLE restraint of trade." "Restraint of trade" means, pretty much, "costs buyers more."

What's "unreasonable" is almost always a judgment call. However, an old Supreme Court case said that when a manufacturer tries to outlaw discounts, this so obviously increases the price that courts don't have to make the call. (In lawyer-speak, the restraint is "unreasonable per se.")

The recent decision overrules the "unreasonable per se" case. Where a seller tries to enforce a minimum price, the dealer who wants to offer a discount must now show that the minimum price restraint is "unreasonable."

The rule against unreasonable restraint of trade is still in effect. As a practical matter, though, having to take this extra step makes antitrust cases more difficult for dealers to win.

Buffet will be less vulnerable to antitrust suits, and retail prices will probably rise.

A "gray market" may spring up, for instruments bought in countries where the restriction is not in effect and imported without a U.S. warranty (as happened with cameras). Buffet has guarded against this with its Platinum Service program, in which François Kloc's group examines and touches up instruments arriving in the U.S.

Buffet will (truthfully) say that Platinum Service ensures that any Buffet bought in the U.S. will be in prime condition.

A cynic might say that Buffet ships semi-finished instruments, which have to be fixed before they're usable. A gray market instrument will probably need work, which won't be under warranty.

Business isn't pretty. It's about making as much money as you can.

Ken Shaw

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Buffet minimum pricing
Author: tictactux 2017
Date:   2007-07-12 20:26

> "Restraint of trade" means, pretty much, "costs buyers more."

Well, I see that every other day, where I try to mail-order something and the site says "this item cannot be shipped outside the U.S.". It is not unusual that for certain items the local price tag is twice of what it is in the U.S.
Even after Buffet's rigidity cure, an E11 costs $1023 in the U.S. and $1291 here. Before, the difference was even bigger. Of course, Buffet is not the only example, there are hundreds, from Apple to Zyxel.

Now such a manufacturer faces increased "grey market" (read: internet) activity, and/or they find out that the small resellers simply can't compete with the big shops, driving them into the arms of the competition. With the global village, "local" prices (that reflect the buying power in the individual countries) are pretty much meaningless. The "warranty" argument is moot anyway as the burden of fulfillment is often left to the reseller, and the customer usually faces substantial ship-back costs.

The rules of the marked haven't necessarily changed. But it's a global market now...

--
Ben

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Buffet minimum pricing
Author: L. Omar Henderson 
Date:   2007-07-13 01:31

Did the rumored price increases come on July 1st?
L. Omar Henderson
www.doctorsprod.com

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Buffet minimum pricing
Author: jbutler 2017
Date:   2007-07-13 11:44

Omar,

I haven't received any notice from Buffet about a price increase. If there was one they left me off the list.



John Butler

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org