Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Bore sizes
Author: gRAHAM 
Date:   2000-05-16 22:41

Hi,

I was looking through a catolog sent to me by leblanc. (Not a sales catolog) They have several clarinets and each one has a different bore. How does the bore size effect the sound and playability of any instrument.

Thanks,
GRaham

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Bore sizes
Author: Beejay 
Date:   2000-05-17 06:37

That's a question that occurs to me as well.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Bore sizes
Author: Dee 
Date:   2000-05-17 10:57

Conventional wisdom is as follows:

Small bore - more focused and more inherently in tune. Easier to use in a classical setting.

Large bore - bigger, bolder sound but player must be more flexible to play in tune. It is also a bit easier to do things like pitch bending. Easier to use in jazz setting.


However, mouthpiece and reed make a major impact on either one. There have been classical players who use big bore horns and jazz players who have used small bore rather than follow "conventional" choices.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Bore sizes
Author: Graham Elliott 
Date:   2000-05-17 15:19

I think it was Mario who wrote a long piece on this some while back, and it is worth searching the board for using key words to access the debate which has gone on over time.

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Bore sizes
Author: Don Berger 
Date:   2000-05-17 15:38

Good suggestion, Graham. Dee's comments are on target as usual. Also see below the "LeBlanc Pete Fountain" thread which turns into a bore discussion. My thots, "To each his own SOUND" . Don

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Bore sizes
Author: Sherwood W. Franklin 
Date:   2000-05-17 16:00

I was looking through the Woodwind Catalog and noticed that the Peter Eaton Clarinet literatute refers to this clarinet as a small bore instrument. The bore size is not mentioned. The Pete Fountain instrument .590 is refered to as a big bore instrument. What is the cut-off between big bore and small bore insruments? I have a Buffet full boehm with a .567 bore and a Selmer 10S with a .567 bore. The Selmer semms to have a darker tone than the Buffet. Is this my imagination or is there rally a difference? Thanks, Wes Franklin

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Bore sizes
Author: J. Butler 
Date:   2000-05-18 01:13

Get O.L. Gibsons book "Clarinet Acoustics" and it explains the effect of bore size, frasing and other aspects of clarinet development/manufacture that is easily read.

J. Butler

Reply To Message
 
 help!!!!!!
Author: Chance Rey 
Date:   2000-05-18 01:31

my clarinet is so flat it drives me nuts. should I get a smaller barrel or what

Reply To Message
 
 RE: help, it's flat!
Author: Don Berger 
Date:   2000-05-18 14:33

C R - If you will describe your clar [dating it as best you can] and mp, likely many of us can help. You should probably start a new thread, since being quite flat isn't related to bore size IMHO. Don

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Bore sizes
Author: Graham Elliott 
Date:   2000-05-18 15:34

The Peter Eaton International is small bore, but quite how small I don't know. His Elite model is very wide (15.2mm). Your general question depends on your point of view. I would say very roughly that 14.6mm to 14.75 is small. 14.8 to 14.95 is medium, and 15.00 to 15.2 (or wider if you are mad enough to make one) is wide. Sorry, can't think in imperial measurements. All of this is subjective.

Sherwood W. Franklin wrote:
-------------------------------
I was looking through the Woodwind Catalog and noticed that the Peter Eaton Clarinet literatute refers to this clarinet as a small bore instrument. The bore size is not mentioned. The Pete Fountain instrument .590 is refered to as a big bore instrument. What is the cut-off between big bore and small bore insruments? I have a Buffet full boehm with a .567 bore and a Selmer 10S with a .567 bore. The Selmer semms to have a darker tone than the Buffet. Is this my imagination or is there rally a difference? Thanks, Wes Franklin

Reply To Message
 
 RE: Bore size Conversion
Author: Don Berger 
Date:   2000-05-18 15:53

Based upon .590" equals 15.0 mm, the English to Metric conversion factor is 25.424, that is, multiply the .590 by it [or divide the 15.0 by it] to obtain the other. I have just now found a new US patent, 6,054,644 "Interchangeable Bore Clarinet Barrel System" which may be of interest to some BBoarders, I will post some details under Inter. Bore Clar. Barrel [above]. Don

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org