Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: GBK 
Date:   2006-01-23 19:33

Trying to settle a debate with a colleague:

Has anyone who has either studied or played the Weber Concerto #2, been taught, or decided to use, an alternate D6 fingering for the D6 in the 2nd measure of the opening entrance of the clarinet (measure 51 from the beginning) in the 1st movement?

...GBK



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: Alseg 
Date:   2006-01-23 19:35

No....why would you need an alternate there?
The standard seems to work fine and also seems logical.


Former creator of CUSTOM CLARINET TUNING BARRELS by DR. ALLAN SEGAL
-Where the Sound Matters Most(tm)-





Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: DavidBlumberg 
Date:   2006-01-23 20:00

H*ll no - not even for Capriccio Espagnol nor the Nielson Concerto.



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: Alseg 
Date:   2006-01-23 20:27

Glenn, what did the colleague have in mind.
Fascinating (raises one eyebrow)

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: GBK 
Date:   2006-01-23 20:38

I didn't want to influence the answers by giving any alternate fingering choices, but his rationale was to try and keep the D6 in the same partial. Thus he suggested using this fingering:

TR + throat G# key o o o + lower RH side Eb key / o o o

David - The above fingering is one I've actually seen players use for the opening of Capriccio Espagnol ...GBK

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: EEBaum 
Date:   2006-01-23 23:02

Ick

-Alex
www.mostlydifferent.com

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: DavidBlumberg 
Date:   2006-01-23 23:05

--------------------------
David - The above fingering is one I've actually seen players use for the opening of Capriccio Espagnol ...GBK
-------------------------


Yes, I know that.


I don't like it, Combs doesn't like it and Ricardo doesn't like it.

Silfes liked it. I don't think the passage has enough balls with the side fingering instead of the regular fingering plus the RH Eb key for the C so it's already down and brightens up the C.



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: clarinetist04 
Date:   2006-01-23 23:37

When I studied this piece, I tried it that way and the D is always too flat and the umph it needs is not there. But I suppose if the D is in tune it may be smoother.

That said, I've never seen it performed using any alt. fingering.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: Paul Aviles 
Date:   2006-01-24 00:18

What's wrong with the ALL OPEN "D?" Just add the last two bottom side keys for intonation in extended situations. I use this a great deal especially in combo with the Eb using just the G# key and the E with just the register and A keys. FAST FAST FAST !!!!

I am working on the Weber as we speak and have consciously taken out many "open" Ds that I was using as a matter of course because the pitch is just a shade too low and most regular D fingerings work fine, however that measure you mention seems a "must" along with the second beat of meas. 229 or twenty-seven bars from the end.

Also depends on your axe. These alternates work a shade better on Leblancs.


..............Paul Aviles

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: DavidBlumberg 
Date:   2006-01-24 01:30

I'd love to hear the recording of Marcellus.



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: GBK 
Date:   2006-01-24 01:45

DavidBlumberg wrote:

> I'd love to hear the recording of Marcellus.



Sony Classical/Legacy SK 93019 ...GBK

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: J. J. 
Date:   2006-01-24 02:56

"What's wrong with the ALL OPEN "'D?'"

It's disgusting, doesn't match in intonation, and doesn't match in timbre, side keys or not. The only time I'd ever use it in mainstream rep. would be in the extremely fast groups of 5 near the end of the Variation.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: Morrigan 
Date:   2006-01-24 06:05

I would say with much certainty that the full fingering should be used, for all the points above. I'm just putting my two cents in because I recently played it with orchestra and know it like the back of my hand!



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: DavidBlumberg 
Date:   2006-01-25 11:40

I almost always choose pitch, timbre, and sound quality over ease of execution.

Do we all use the resonance A fingering because it's easy to do?  ;)



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: Paul Aviles 
Date:   2006-01-25 11:56

I recall a lesson with John Bruce Yeh in which I was completely frustrated with whatever the task was at hand on the grounds of technical complexity (I think it must have been Rose 40 nr. 1). I said, "If I can't even do this, how could I possibly play something like the Nielsen Concerto?"

John said, "Oh, the Nielsen is EASY, it's all fake fingers."


Disclaimer: We never worked on the Nielsen together so I don't know to which fingers he was speaking. I gave up after Rose nr. 3. John Yeh may no longer use fake fingers. After all that was twenty-four years ago.


................respectfully,

........................Paul Aviles



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Weber Concerto #2 Op.74 No.2
Author: Gregory Smith 2017
Date:   2006-01-26 04:20

Because the regular high D fingering sounds better? If one can't master that kind of transition of registers then what is it that they can handle?

I (and my teacher Marcellus) always thought that being able to use a standard fingering was not simply a "king of the mountain" kind of thing but rather a necessity for those occasions when one was required to have to rely upon them. They inevitably come up in the literature and any clarinetist not able to employ them will eventually have to compromise in some form or another in some way, someday.

This subject reminds me of many threads that have gone before about whether the primary fingering for throat f# is the top fingering or the one employing the two side trill keys.

Needless to say, the Rimsky is played by Marcellus using all of the standard or regular fingerings. Even the high "F" noodles in Daphnis on the Szell/Cleveland recording are played using all of the standard fingerings. But you're talking about someone that after practicing over the span of just a few short weeks and within the span of two lessons with Bonade played the Jeanjean 16 Moderne - the first eight one lesson, the second 8 the next lesson. Even Bonade was impressed beyond words.

But, not to show too much or inappropriate praise for such a feat, at the end of the two lessons Bonade coyly explained that it was indeed quite an accomplishment although a few days earlier, he had a young woman who played straight through the stark Arp. studies in one lesson - and at record speed.

Gregory Smith



Post Edited (2006-01-26 04:22)

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org