The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: Gordon (NZ)
Date: 2005-01-14 07:02
It seems that Moennig began with the assumption that the manufacturer had made a poor job of acoustic design. And that may have been valid.
I would like to believe that many of today's models have some pretty good compromises of acoustic design sorted out, especially with CAD-CAM technology available to them to fine tune acoustic design, and quickly and accurately replicate appropriate tone hole placement and undercutting.
A little optimism doesn't hurt, but perhaps I am dreaming.
|
|
|
marcello.mollo |
2005-01-07 22:34 |
|
ron b |
2005-01-07 22:55 |
|
Dano |
2005-01-08 01:15 |
|
marcello.mollo |
2005-01-08 01:18 |
|
Vytas |
2005-01-08 01:21 |
|
marcello.mollo |
2005-01-08 01:27 |
|
pewd |
2005-01-08 02:14 |
|
ron b |
2005-01-08 06:20 |
|
Gordon (NZ) |
2005-01-08 10:28 |
|
nickma |
2005-01-08 11:41 |
|
Covalaga |
2005-01-08 22:31 |
|
marcello.mollo |
2005-01-10 21:16 |
|
Vytas |
2005-01-08 16:15 |
|
hartt |
2005-01-08 16:46 |
|
Gordon (NZ) |
2005-01-08 20:42 |
|
ron b |
2005-01-08 22:05 |
|
Gardini |
2005-01-10 22:51 |
|
Vytas |
2005-01-13 16:46 |
|
avincel |
2005-01-13 17:20 |
|
ron b |
2005-01-13 18:53 |
|
Claritech |
2005-01-13 21:24 |
|
Gordon (NZ) |
2005-01-14 01:16 |
|
GBK |
2005-01-14 05:08 |
|
Gordon (NZ) |
2005-01-14 07:02 |
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
|