Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Spamarrest
Author: Mark Charette 
Date:   2004-11-23 14:12

Please, turn off all spamarrest type filtering for messages authenticated to be from woodwind.org or mail.sneezy.org. All email addresses provided when signing in must be accessible by the mail servers here without being intercepted by spam filters.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Spamarrest
Author: Don Berger 
Date:   2004-11-23 14:33

Will do, Mark [if I can]. "MY AOL 9.0" has just now installed such a filter in my comp., but gives me a list of the messages filtered for my review and [nearly complete so far] deletion, apparently responding to complaints ?? Am happy to accept any advice. Don

Thanx, Mark, Don

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Spamarrest
Author: Mark Charette 
Date:   2004-11-23 14:39

That's a different technique and doesn't have the same problem. "Spamarrest"-type systems need positive feedback from the sender - they require the human sender to type something before their messages are received by the recipient. While they're great for random spam, they're absolutely horrid for automated systems that you've subscribed to. The system-generated message doesn't have a "human" behind it to go to some web site and type in something. In fact, if all you have is email, it's impossible to send any mail to someone with this feature if you're not "whitelisted".

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Spamarrest
Author: David Peacham 
Date:   2004-11-23 16:52

Mark C wrote:

"While they're great for random spam"

Is that deliberately ambiguous, Mark? You must know that SpamArrest have been accused (rightly or not, I cannot say) of being spammers themselves.

-----------

If there are so many people on this board unwilling or unable to have a civil and balanced discussion about important issues, then I shan't bother to post here any more.

To the great relief of many of you, no doubt.


Reply To Message
 
 Re: Spamarrest
Author: Mark Charette 
Date:   2004-11-23 17:00

David Peacham wrote:

> Mark C wrote:
>
> "While they're great for random spam"
>
> Is that deliberately ambiguous, Mark?

LOL! Hadn't meant the double meaning, but I'll take credit for it  :)

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Spamarrest
Author: DavidBlumberg 
Date:   2004-11-23 18:16

That's a different technique and doesn't have the same problem. "Spamarrest"-type systems need positive feedback from the sender - they require the human sender to type something before their messages are received by the recipient. While they're great for random spam, they're absolutely horrid for automated systems that you've subscribed to. The system-generated message doesn't have a "human" behind it to go to some web site and type in something. In fact, if all you have is email, it's impossible to send any mail to someone with this feature if you're not "whitelisted".
---------------------------------------------


For Spamarrest users they should be checking their mail at the spamarrest server to make sure that there isn't any legit mail being held. I authorise users quite often on my end even though they get the mail to go to the site to enter the code to prove that they aren't a bot.



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Spamarrest
Author: Mark Charette 
Date:   2004-11-23 18:35

DavidBlumberg wrote:

> I authorise users quite often on my end even though
> they get the mail to go to the site to enter the code to prove
> that they aren't a bot.

However, if I get "bounce mail" when I have the system verify addresses I will drop the account. There needs to be a way to automatically set up a whitelist for particular servers.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Spamarrest
Author: pewd 
Date:   2004-11-23 19:30

do you guys recommend spamarrest?

-paul <--- needs a new spam filter, present one isnt cutting it

- Paul Dods
Dallas, Texas

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Spamarrest
Author: Contra 
Date:   2004-11-23 19:40

I've never heard of spamarrest before, but I'll go on the lookout for it in case Hotmail installs it or something.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Spamarrest
Author: DavidBlumberg 
Date:   2004-11-23 19:45

There is - it's under options. A user can authorize an entire domain very easily.

I highly recommend spamarrest as it deadends all spam without ever lossing a single legit mail - can can see all the spam before it is deleted and manually delete it, and ban the sending address so that you never get mail from that address again.

send an e-mail to anything@mytempo.com and you can see how it works. But if you do use it make sure to click on the options link and authorize the domains that you get mail lists from as the bounces clog up the sending mailers or they just consider it an invalid address and drop the subscription after a few times.



Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org