Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Dumb "C4" Question
Author: John Stackpole 
Date:   2004-11-21 12:33

If I had paid proper attention back (waaaay back) in High School I might know the answer, but...

To the right of the blue headline "The Clarinet BBoard" on this page is a little G-clef with a C note and a red "C4".

What's the "C4" mean?

JDS

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Dumb "C4" Question
Author: Stepan 
Date:   2004-11-21 12:40

C is because it is C.
4? The highest note in my fingering chart is a3. Someone may even reach c4? It might be some clarinet Mt. Everest.

I really do not know.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Dumb "C4" Question
Author: John Stackpole 
Date:   2004-11-21 13:59

Answering my own question (I think)..

C4 simply mean the 4th C-note up from the bottom on a standard piano.

Its just an alternate music notation.

Did I get it right?

JDS

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Dumb "C4" Question
Author: Mark Charette 
Date:   2004-11-21 14:22

John, you're right - C4 is middle C (the 4th C) on a full size (88 key) piano keyboard.

The reason it's on the page is because the notation used for basing clarinet (and other instruments) notes varies; some use the piano reference (where a written middle C is referred to as C4) and some use a reference based on the lowest note on the instrument (the 1st C encountered would be C1). On the BBoard when people want to refer to the different notes unambigously, we use the piano middle C as our reference.

There's always argument over which is better; IMO it doesn't matter as long as we're speaking the same "language" and I picked the C4 as the reference.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Dumb "C4" Question
Author: Don Berger 
Date:   2004-11-21 15:22

Yes, TKS to Mark C, for bringing a bit of order out of chaos ! Quite a few of us date far enough back [in BBoard communications] to remember some confused/confusing discussions we have had with this particular terminology. IMHO, nearly every author of technical writings has problems with terms/definitions etc. Al Rice's recent book "The Clarinet In The Classical Period" devotes the first 6 pages to "Abbreviations, Conventions, Notes to Readers and Musical Notation" as I'm quite sure all of our other "good books" do in their own way. In my engineering, chemical, patent career, this has been a seemingly never-ending struggle in trying to define what we are talking about. Got wordy again, didn't I, GBK/M C. If this just opens a larger "can of worms" , please squelch. Don

Thanx, Mark, Don

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org