Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Zinner blanks/mouthpiece comparison
Author: Ed 
Date:   2003-02-24 01:52

Many mouthpiece makers out there are using the Zinner blank for their mouthpieces. (Smith, Fobes, Grabner, Lomax, Hawkins, etc) I am sure each maker is looking for slightly different results and doing slightly different things to the facing or interior. Since they are using the same or similar raw material, I am wondering how the characteristics of each compare for anyone who have played a number of different ones.



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Zinner blanks/mouthpiece comparison
Author: Liquorice 
Date:   2003-02-24 11:11

I've played mouthpieces by Viotto and Greg Smith, both using Zinner blanks. The mouthpieces have very different facings. They sound and respond completely differently. The material is good, but ultimately I think it's the design that makes most of the difference.

I also had Viotto put the same facing on a Zinner and a Vandoren blank. The Vandoren sounded a bit brighter, but there wasn't a huge difference.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Zinner blanks/mouthpiece comparison
Author: William 
Date:   2003-02-24 16:00

I think that the blanks make a difference. Years ago (1970), I sent my Chicago Kaspar #14 out to Charlie Bay who copied its facing onto one of his Ithica custom mpcs. The resulting Bay played with much more "presence" than the Kaspar, although they both had the same facing (confirmed by my old clarinet professor who measured both pieces). I am currently playing my Kaspar, however I still use that Bay occassionally when I simply need more volume. My point remains, however, both Kaspar and Bay used different blanks and that is the basis for the different sounds.

Perhaps economics and availability (apart from pure quality) have something to do with the extensive use of Zinners among different mouthpiece makers.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Zinner blanks/mouthpiece comparison
Author: Clarence 
Date:   2003-02-25 04:39

Ed,

Of the mouthpieces that you mentioned, I have had a trial on Smith, Lomax and Hawkins. All three of these mouthpieces had very good sound, good altissimo characteristics and are designed for V12 3 1/2 reeds. Here is a short summary.


Hawkins Std: High resistence

Not very reed friendly and limited dynamic range.


Smith: medium-low resistence

Smooth playing with good dynamic range. I would have like these mouthpieces better if they were available in a wider tip opening.


Lomax: Low resistence

Wide dynamic range. Excellent sound with good ring. My mouthpiece search of 6 months ended with me buying the Lomax Classic A3. I spent more on mouthpiece trials then I paid for this mouthpiece, but this is what I was looking for.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Zinner blanks/mouthpiece comparison
Author: jez 
Date:   2003-02-25 18:23

Can anyone tell me how the Zinner blank differs from the Babbitt?
I think most of my mp's were from Babbitt.
Do Vandoren supply blanks or was Liquorice's a finished mp refaced?

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Zinner blanks/mouthpiece comparison
Author: Liquorice 
Date:   2003-02-25 22:17

Mine was a Vandoren refaced by Viotto. Sorry for the confusion. I don't think Vandoren supply blanks.

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org