Woodwind.OrgKeepersThe C4 standard

 
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Previous Message  |  Next Message 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?
Author: Brenda Siewert 
Date:   2005-12-30 19:34

I also get paid to play--and I use my Kaspar. I know many professionals who use genuine Vintage Kaspars all the time as their main mouthpiece (including my friend Chet). But, my question was exactly what you were addressing, Frank--sometimes I wonder if the extra need to have the vintage ones refaced for maximum performance is a good idea, or if the new clones are about as good. So far my experience has been, no...the vintage are better. Brad Behn refaced my Kaspar Chicago and it's a gem to play. If you're a collector and not a player, you probably don't want to reface the mouthpiece. I've owned some Chedevilles and some Kaspars that were perfect (like the one I broke) without needing refacing.

Chet, ditto!



Post Edited (2005-12-30 19:36)
 Avail. Forums  |  Flat View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 

 Topics Author  Date
 Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Brenda Siewert 2005-12-29 15:16 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Ken Shaw 2005-12-29 15:31 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Brenda Siewert 2005-12-29 15:35 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
L. Omar Henderson 2005-12-29 17:33 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Brenda Siewert 2005-12-29 18:05 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
L. Omar Henderson 2005-12-29 18:38 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
frank 2005-12-29 20:09 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
L. Omar Henderson 2005-12-29 22:55 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
L. Omar Henderson 2005-12-29 23:40 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Mark Charette 2005-12-29 23:52 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
archer1960 2005-12-30 14:08 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Bill 2005-12-30 15:02 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
frank 2005-12-30 18:23 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Chetclarinet 2005-12-30 18:51 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Brenda Siewert 2005-12-30 19:34 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
DAVE 2006-01-01 19:46 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Gregory Smith 2006-01-01 22:17 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Llewsrac 2006-01-01 22:45 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
L. Omar Henderson 2006-01-02 03:03 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Gregory Smith 2006-01-02 18:51 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Brenda Siewert 2006-01-02 21:37 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Shorthand 2006-01-02 23:57 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Gregory Smith 2006-01-03 00:55 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Shorthand 2006-01-03 04:39 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Shorthand 2006-01-03 04:40 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Alseg 2006-01-03 01:16 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Alseg 2006-01-03 14:20 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Brenda Siewert 2006-01-03 14:45 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
William 2006-01-03 17:08 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Gregory Smith 2006-01-03 17:49 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
L. Omar Henderson 2006-01-03 18:31 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Scotti 2006-01-03 19:45 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Sylvain 2006-01-03 20:05 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Brenda Siewert 2006-01-03 20:37 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
mnorswor 2006-01-03 22:10 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Gregory Smith 2006-01-03 22:40 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Brenda Siewert 2006-01-03 22:47 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
Gregory Smith 2006-01-04 01:48 
 Re: Vintage, or Vintage Clone?  new
GBK 2006-01-04 02:43 


 This thread is closed 
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org