Author: Pereira3D
Date: 2020-07-05 23:19
Hello, I'll start with the disclaimer that I manufacture 3D-printed clarinet mouthpieces among other clarinet products. I think Syos has a very interesting concept and seems to be great at tailoring the mouthpieces to the needs of their customer base. I also think that you're right in assuming that the customer base is more of the doubler/jazz scene.
The primary issue when making a dependable mouthpiece for classical players is the finishing. With jazz players embracing the extra flexibility of a larger tip opening and typically using softer reeds (I know this is just a generalization, but for the argument's sake), the mouthpiece can be more forgiving with a finish straight from the printer. In the classical realm, particularly for myself being a close-tip mouthpiece player, the very small layer lines alone would make the mouthpiece unplayable in my experience. This is especially so with my 3.5+ or 4 strength reeds. Classical players rely on the nuances and the balance between mouthpiece and reed. Even a light refacing goes such a long way to create a more reliable response and consistent quality of sound. The material selection for mouthpieces is also something that I believe will evolve with time when it comes to 3D printing. Lastly, I do believe the price tag is kind of rich knowing what they cost to manufacture via 3D printing along with no hand-finishing or cork costs, but I suppose if there's demand, then go for gold.
Quick side-note: I've noticed that having cork rather than O-rings, while more annoying, costly, and time-consuming to install, dampens the sound just enough to balance the 3D-printed materials very well. This may not be the case with hard rubber, so YMMV.
Ryan Pereira
Pereira 3D Clarinet Services
www.Pereira3D.com
|
|
The Clarinet BBoard
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
