Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Previous Message  |  Next Message 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings
Author: Caroline Smale 
Date:   2015-11-12 03:15

The price list is probably nearer 1960 or even earlier - it lists the Emperor Bb outfit at £35 and I paid £30 for mine in 1954. At that time the Emperor was almost identical to the Imperial 926, only discernable difference was that it was Nickle rather than silver plated, but it actually had a fully rodded mechanism just like the 926 and 1010 of same period.

The Bass to low C (not listed - probably only available to special order) was actually the standard bass to low Eb but with an extra low C joint which fitted between the standard Eb bell tenon and the bell.
There is actually a step down in the bore at this point between the existing bell flare and the new joint but it seems to work fine.
Only downside is ergonomics as all the 3 bottom tones are played only by the RH thumb with no alternatives for the pinkies.

The actual tone quality of the Imperial bass is in my opinion actually superior to most new basses in particular in the clarinet register which has a more natural clarinet sound rather than the throaty rather hollow tone on most modern instruments.



 Reply To Message  |  Avail. Forums  |  Flat View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 

 Topics Author  Date
 Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
alanporter 2009-06-15 02:06 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2009-06-15 10:42 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
yvonne246 2009-06-25 18:51 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
alanporter 2009-06-15 16:12 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2009-06-25 23:34 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
yvonne246 2009-06-26 15:29 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Pastor Rob 2017-02-13 07:48 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
clarnibass 2009-06-26 08:28 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2009-06-26 09:52 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Mike Clarinet 2009-06-26 12:08 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2009-06-26 12:35 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Caroline Smale 2009-06-26 22:13 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
dubrosa22 2015-11-10 23:40 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Caroline Smale 2015-11-11 00:43 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2015-11-11 02:07 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2015-11-11 02:10 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Caroline Smale 2015-11-11 04:47 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Cath 2017-02-12 00:24 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Jeroen 2015-11-12 02:30 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2015-11-12 02:49 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  
Caroline Smale 2015-11-12 03:15 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2017-02-12 00:42 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Cath 2017-02-14 11:42 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2017-02-14 00:50 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris_C 2017-02-14 15:21 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Tony F 2017-02-14 19:00 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Caroline Smale 2017-02-15 01:35 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Cath 2017-02-15 02:30 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Cath 2017-02-15 13:43 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org