The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: JKL
Date: 2015-10-10 22:51
I definitely prefer the 1924 version to the 1930 one! I wouldn´t call the 1930 version "more sophisticated". In a way the 1924 recording is more sophisticated because of its ambiguity: It is not only a Jazz player playing the music like Jazz players would do ist, but for me he plays it like a Jazz player imitating a Klezmer player. So the 1924 recording has an element of parody or irony or spoof which you have to understand and which I like very much, but which obviously was not suitable for commercial purposes - the mainstream of society wouldn´t understand this. So for me the 1930 version is commercially smoothed like the most later recordings.
I like very much the clarinettist of the 1924 recording plays the second run (from F to Bb) - as a glissando as well, which makes much sense to me. (and by the way - for my ears the clarinettist of the the 1930 recording starts the second run (from F) an octave lower than Gershwin wrote it, doesn´t he?)
JKL
Post Edited (2015-10-10 23:07)
|
|
|
John J. Moses |
2015-10-07 07:17 |
|
Liquorice |
2015-10-07 16:38 |
|
DougR |
2015-10-09 04:47 |
|
donald |
2015-10-09 14:43 |
|
Ed Lowry |
2015-10-10 08:18 |
|
donald |
2015-10-10 15:53 |
|
donald |
2015-10-10 15:56 |
|
seabreeze |
2015-10-10 20:34 |
|
Re: Gershwin's Rhapsody letter (new) |
|
JKL |
2015-10-10 22:51 |
|
seabreeze |
2015-10-10 23:48 |
|
Wes |
2015-10-11 08:06 |
|
Ed Lowry |
2015-10-11 09:21 |
|
donald |
2015-10-11 13:51 |
|
Paul Aviles |
2015-10-11 16:42 |
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
|