Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Previous Message  |  Next Message 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings
Author: Caroline Smale 
Date:   2009-06-26 22:13

re Mike's question - for many years the 926 and 1010 were just as you suggest, both same quality but different acoustic design, they were for some years both called "Imperial" and in the middle period the 926 had its keys all mounted on rods (I own 2 models from 1951 and 1953 both made this way).
I believe that because the 926 was the model bought primarily by the military that may have been reason for the move away from rod to point screws since rods don't take so kindly to rough handling and easily bind.
Both my instruments also show signs of hand tuning by gentle undercutting, something never found on their lower grade instruments.
In later years the quality control on both started to slip, probably more so on 926 than 1010, but I saw shoddy new examples of both in the late 70's.



 Reply To Message  |  Avail. Forums  |  Flat View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 

 Topics Author  Date
 Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
alanporter 2009-06-15 02:06 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2009-06-15 10:42 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
yvonne246 2009-06-25 18:51 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
alanporter 2009-06-15 16:12 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2009-06-25 23:34 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
yvonne246 2009-06-26 15:29 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Pastor Rob 2017-02-13 07:48 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
clarnibass 2009-06-26 08:28 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2009-06-26 09:52 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Mike Clarinet 2009-06-26 12:08 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2009-06-26 12:35 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  
Caroline Smale 2009-06-26 22:13 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
dubrosa22 2015-11-10 23:40 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Caroline Smale 2015-11-11 00:43 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2015-11-11 02:07 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2015-11-11 02:10 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Caroline Smale 2015-11-11 04:47 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  
Cath 2017-02-12 00:24 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Jeroen 2015-11-12 02:30 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2015-11-12 02:49 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Caroline Smale 2015-11-12 03:15 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2017-02-12 00:42 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Cath 2017-02-14 11:42 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris P 2017-02-14 00:50 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Chris_C 2017-02-14 15:21 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Tony F 2017-02-14 19:00 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Caroline Smale 2017-02-15 01:35 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Cath 2017-02-15 02:30 
 Re: Boosey and Hawkes rankings  new
Cath 2017-02-15 13:43 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org