Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Previous Message  |  Next Message 
 Re: Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?
Author: sherman 
Date:   2007-05-02 14:17

David:
I believe that you have hit the nail directly on the head of any problems with the Ridenour Clarinets.I play one, and it is still the best instrument I have every played, bar none. From the aspects of:? Basically the sound is beautiful,better in my mind than any I have played. 2. The intonation is as good as any horn, with the exception of alitissima F#, which is flat with the basic fingering, though with an available 4 or 5 other fingerings available more or less conveniently.
3. Exceptionally the low e and f are intune, not flat , really flat on some, and 4. the 12th above are aso intune. 5. the high c is intune. 5. the scale is even to begin with. 6. the ability to make large intervals with minimal angst, and qvetching is notable.
There are other notable betterments , however I have found that there are a couple of things lacking which must be noted as well:
The keys are not soft or hard or soft-boiled, but they seem placed not quite correctly and the thumbrest sucks, though I have placed all kinds of things on it and they all help. So, it is my belief that these negative aspects of the horn need to be made more amenable, which will come I'm sure with time, as many things begun in China in a somewhat roughshod manner have straightened to a highly acceptable degree. Basically it is a great horn, with the exceptions and the leveler is the price, which is pure giveaway. I have a set, the A being the best horn I ever put my fingers to, and the Bb is also quite acceptable. The price for the 2 was under a thousand dollars. Tom has adjusted my Bb several times, at no charge, but he cannot change the keys, an irritant. But the horns are better than any French clarinets, or Japanese, and my point if I may, is that students do not have a lot of bucks to spray around or to ask their fathers or mothers for,or to borrow, so the choice is easy.
Davd S. is absolutely correct.


Sherman Friedland




 Reply To Message  |  Avail. Forums  |  Flat View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 

 Topics Author  Date
 Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?  new
Dano 2007-04-30 16:00 
 Re: Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?  new
Chris P 2007-04-30 16:11 
 Re: Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?  new
sherman 2007-04-30 17:18 
 Re: Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?  new
David Spiegelthal 2007-04-30 17:28 
 Re: Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?  new
Pathik 2007-05-01 05:34 
 Re: Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?  new
Terry Stibal 2007-05-01 14:01 
 Re: Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?  new
Pathik 2007-05-01 15:13 
 Re: Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?  new
Dano 2007-05-01 21:55 
 Re: Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?  new
David Spiegelthal 2007-05-02 02:43 
 Re: Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?  
sherman 2007-05-02 14:17 
 Re: Why not a Ridenour BC 147 Bass Clarinet?  new
Dano 2007-05-02 03:09 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org