|  The Clarinet BBoard 
 
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: Chris P Date:   2007-08-20 20:37
 
 ... then who's 1st symphony is Brahms' 5th?
 
 Former oboe finisher
 Howarth of London
 1998 - 2010
 
 Independent Woodwind Repairer
 Single and Double Reed Specialist
 Oboes, Clarinets and Saxes
 
 NOT A MEMBER OF N.A.M.I.R.
 
 The opinions I express are my own.
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: Ski Date:   2007-08-20 20:53
 
 There's no way for me to confirm GBK's answer, cuz I was never very good at math.
 
 BTW, where am I?
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: Kevin Date:   2007-08-20 22:18
 
 If the function f(Beethoven 1) is equivalent to the function g(Haydn 109), and f(Brahms 1) is equivalent to g(Beethoven 10), and f(Mahler 1) is equivalent to g(Brahms 5), then please express the value of [Bruckner 0] in terms of Haydn.
 
 
 
 Post Edited (2007-08-20 22:20)
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: Caco185 Date:   2007-08-20 22:30
 
 *laughing* very hard
 
 Dale Huggard
 Clarinet Performance Major, Michigan
 Buffet R-13 - Silver plated
 Genussa Excellente
 Spriggs Floating Rail Ligature
 Vandoren V12 #4
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: CPW Date:   2007-08-21 00:12
 
 Is this  headed back to a zeroth point....The BIG BAND theory of musical creation. ?
 Or ahead to the nth symphonhy of all composers.?
 
 Hopefully no detours through the Yale University of composition.
 
 Watch out for the monoliths.
 
 Against the windmills of my mind
 The jousting pole splinters
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: bahamutofskycon Date:   2007-08-21 02:39
 
 Not to be a party pooper or anything, but...
 
 IMHO Brahms would have been insulted to know that Mahler was even suggested as his successor.  Mahler and Brahms are idealogically and musically opposites for all intents and purposes.
 
 Also, I seem to recall in my research that Brahms wrote a letter imploring Dvorak to take over some conservatory just so Bruckner wouldn't be able to ruin it.
 
 Not that that answers the question though.
 
 Steve Ballas
 
 
 
 Post Edited (2007-08-21 02:47)
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: GBK Date:   2007-08-21 03:10
 
 My Mahler reference was a tongue in cheek answer (a la Brahms magnified to the 10th power).
 
 For the serious answer - Many historians feel that Max Reger is the one composer who carried on the stylists traits of Brahms into the next century...GBK
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: bahamutofskycon Date:   2007-08-21 03:44
 
 GBK - apparently I'm not so good with catching sarcasm
  
 Reger is a good choice.
 
 If I remember correctly, Hindemith was verly influenced by Brahms' compositional techniques.  However, he's certainly not a candidate for Brahms No. 5.
 
 Steve Ballas
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: Mike Blinn Date:   2007-08-21 05:05
 
 I say Arnold Schoenberg, who orchestrated Brahms' Piano Quartet in G minor, and turned it into a symphony Brahms would have been proud of.
 
 Mike Blinn
 
 
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: Ski Date:   2007-08-21 07:24
 
 Hindemath: is that like (J.S. Bach + late Beethoven - Strauss) = Schoenberg?
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: graham Date:   2007-08-21 16:09
 
 Actually it is Elgar's second.  Elgar's first is Wagner's first........
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: Musinix Date:   2007-08-21 17:06
 
 There are three types of people in the world.
 
 One, those that can count, and
 two, those that can't count.
 
 Thomas Fiebig
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: Alseg Date:   2007-08-21 17:43
 
 Hindemath(sic)+ Schoenberg=Anton Webern
 Grateful Dead +Arrowsmith=Kiss
 
 
 Former creator of CUSTOM  CLARINET TUNING BARRELS   by DR. ALLAN SEGAL
 -Where the Sound Matters Most(tm)-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: Ski Date:   2007-08-21 18:03
 
 Alseg,
 
 I think you've worked out the Hindemath correctly for your first mathematical theorem (although you spelled Hindemith incorrectly. I know, doctor's handwriting and all that...).
 
 But I'm not sure about your second theorem. I believe you want to multiply Alice Cooper with Arrowsmith(sp?) and leave the Dead out of the equation.
 
 
 ![[grin]](http://test.woodwind.org/clarinet/BBoard/smileys/smilie5.gif) 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: Kevin Date:   2007-08-21 18:45
 
 Boston = NYY + 5.0
 Atlanta = Philadelphia = NYM - 5.0
 
 All's well in the world.
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: Mark Charette Date:   2007-08-21 19:11
 
 Kevin wrote:
 
 > Boston = NYY + 5.0
 > Atlanta = Philadelphia = NYM - 5.0
 
 Foul! Has to be musical ...
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
    |  |  
    | 
    | Author: John J. Moses Date:   2007-08-23 04:58
 
 Lets see:
 
 Brahms' Sym.#1 "C"
 Brahms' Sym.#2 "D"
 Brahms' Sym.#3 "F"
 Brahms' Sym.#4 "E"
 
 Therefore his Sym. #5 would have been in "A"
 
 He was using Mozart's popular theme from the "Jupiter Sym." as his basis for his Sym. keys "C", "D", "F", "E", "AAAA"
 
 Too many WICKED's on Broadway (over 1000 performances and way too much time...)
 
 Be well, my friends.
 
 JJM
 Légère Artist
 Clark W. Fobes Artist
 
 
 
 |  |  
    | Reply To Message 
 |  
 
 | The Clarinet Pages
 
 |  |