 Keepers
|
Author: Liquorice
Date: 2006-01-17 15:45
I was uncertain about (3) because I questioned whether "the combination of (1) and (2) above gives a lower-lip/reed contact that is small". It wouldn't do this if you had a very long upper lip and short teeth, for example!
But I do understand that the theory should work if you have "typical" lips, and that as you said, it should then produce "about the right bottom wrap." Thanks for clearing that up.
By the way Tony, I'm reading your article "phasing in contention" again, and it's even more of a revelation to me now than it was the first time I read it (about 4 years ago)!!
Post Edited (2006-01-17 15:46)
|
|
|
Tony Pay |
2006-01-17 04:39 |
|
Liquorice |
2006-01-17 06:03 |
|
Tony Pay |
2006-01-17 09:04 |
|
Paul Globus |
2006-01-17 15:55 |
   |
Re: Why a revelation? new |
|
Liquorice |
2006-01-17 15:45 |
|
Clarinetgirl06 |
2006-01-17 20:54 |
|
Phurster |
2006-01-18 01:03 |
|
Tony Pay |
2006-01-18 22:32 |
|
ned |
2006-01-18 23:07 |
|
Tom Puwalski |
2006-01-19 00:45 |
|
Tony Pay |
2006-01-19 13:42 |
|
Phurster |
2006-01-19 01:46 |
|
hinotehud |
2006-01-20 02:40 |
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
 |
