The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: Micaela
Date: 2001-02-24 00:14
What are the comparative merits and shortcomings of these sets of etudes? This is a recurring argument between me and another clarinetist in my orchestra- he insists Kroepsch and the Voxman/Rubank Advanced are the best, I go by Rose and bits of the Baermann division III. I'm curious- the Kroepsch studies are only one line long and he plays them so slowly that they aren't terribly difficult.
I know that most people learn Rose and Baermann, but I've never heard of Kroepsch before. Has anyone studied his etudes?
Thanks,
Micaela
|
|
|
Rose and Kroepsch |
|
Micaela |
2001-02-24 00:14 |
|
John Gibson (the other one) |
2001-02-24 16:23 |
|
someone |
2001-02-24 20:21 |
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
|