The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: Ski
Date: 2007-09-06 23:53
On the heels of what you wrote, Phillip, I guess I'm just not that "democratic" of a composer. When I write something I expect it to be played as written. When something isn't played as written but I end up liking what I heard, I'll consider making a change to the score; I'm not that inflexible.
I'll often work with performers to understand where performance difficulties might lie and change the score if something's just a little too complicated to play. I'm more concerned in having my musical gestures and melodies well-represented than I am interested in taxing a performer needlessly.
In my music, when there are no indications for a given length of time it means, quite plainly -- as it does on most pieces of music -- that the mood, dynamic, tempo, continue as they were last indicated. And that's a convention I didn't learn on my own.
Like Alex said before, an overly-marked score can itself present an emotionally stifling situation. I strive not to overmark my scores so that the peformer feels a sense of freedom within the confines of the composition. My composition is an expression of me which I hope other people can find expressive for themselves as well. But at the end of the day, when I write something I'm not doing it to have it become a wiki-composition where everyone can come in and change its meaning. Some music is more "democratic" than others I guess, but I see nothing wrong with that.
Post Edited (2007-09-06 23:54)
|
|
|
skygardener |
2007-09-05 01:23 |
|
Ski |
2007-09-05 03:36 |
|
EEBaum |
2007-09-05 05:03 |
|
skygardener |
2007-09-05 05:22 |
|
skygardener |
2007-09-05 06:01 |
|
Ski |
2007-09-05 05:55 |
|
nes |
2007-09-05 09:30 |
|
Bubalooy |
2007-09-05 20:02 |
|
skygardener |
2007-09-06 04:00 |
|
EEBaum |
2007-09-06 04:36 |
|
nes |
2007-09-06 07:20 |
|
EEBaum |
2007-09-06 18:15 |
|
Bubalooy |
2007-09-06 22:06 |
|
Philip Caron |
2007-09-06 22:46 |
|
Re: Playing the music new |
|
Ski |
2007-09-06 23:53 |
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
|