Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Kaspar/Chedeville/Backun/Other?
Author: travelingclarinetist 
Date:   2010-12-31 04:47

I have just purchased an R13 and am looking for the best set up. I hear alot of talk about these mouthpieces but don't know the difference. I hear "open" "medium tip", etc. What does this mean? Also, what combination works with which barrels, etc. Thanks,

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Kaspar/Chedeville/Backun/Other?
Author: sonicbang 
Date:   2010-12-31 09:54

You will get a lot of totally different idea/opinion/advice from a lot of clarinettist here. They would suggest what they belive to be the best (for them). The most popular advice after all is this: 'you should figure out what is the best for you, try as many mouthpieces and barrels as you can and buy the best you can afford'.

I just want to save time for you.

Happy new year

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Kaspar/Chedeville/Backun/Other?
Author: weberfan 
Date:   2010-12-31 13:04



I presume that the R13 is not your first clarinet. What mouthpiece/reed combination were you using previously? Were you happy with it? If so, why change?

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Kaspar/Chedeville/Backun/Other?
Author: kdk 
Date:   2010-12-31 14:07

What kind of playing do you do? Are you a student or an experienced player? What mouthpiece have you used previously? Barrels are another whole set of possibilities, but there isn't one combination that is "best" nor even a narrow range of such combinations. Ultimately it depends on your playing needs and your already established habits.

If you're an established player (of any level of accomplishment) my best advice would be to stay with whatever mouthpiece you've been using and the barrel that comes with he R-13 at first. As you play, decide what if anything in the results you're getting you want to change. Then start asking around or reading about mouthpieces and barrels that are meant to address the specific issues you've identified.

If you're a student, especially of high school age or younger, get a teacher's advice. Hearing you play in person makes it much easier to separate what changes can be made through technique and what might be easier to make with equipment.

If you're an interested amateur adult who is just getting back to the clarinet after an extended absence, stay with what you have at hand until you've gotten back to a comfortable level of control and security. Then listen to what you're producing and, again, decide what you want to change.

Karl

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Kaspar/Chedeville/Backun/Other?
Author: travelingclarinetist 
Date:   2011-01-01 00:11

Thanks,

I am an adult student who has been "out of the loop" for many, many years. I hear great things about the Zinner blanks from Muncy-that they pretty much are Backun's prototype. What do the dimensions mean-ie. tip opening, depth, etc. From their website:
Chamber Specifications:
Chamber A has a standard sidewall with a deeper baffle.
Chamber E has a standard sidewall with a higher baffle.

Tip Opening Specifications:
-1mm can be from approximately .92 to .98 mm.
+1mm can be from 1.02 to 1.08 mm.

I have an R13, have been playing for about 25 years on and off. Mouthpieces have been Gennusa and Vandoren. Looking to achieve that big nice sound that gets noticed in orchestra.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Kaspar/Chedeville/Backun/Other?
Author: kdk 
Date:   2011-01-01 18:21

Zinner-based mouthpieces are pretty ubiquitous. The two blanks, A and E, have different tonal characteristics and the E, I believe, tends to be pitched a little sharper. Many of the American makers who use Zinner blanks use either the A blank or a custom blank of their own design based on the A.

Tip openings anywhere around - within + or - .03 or so of 1 mm are considered close tips.

There's nothing generically wrong with either the Gennusa or the Vandoren mouthpieces. My advice would be to get back to the best shape you can with whichever of those feels most comfortable. Once you're in control and getting the best result you feel you can get, then it may be time to consider something new on top of the clarinet. I personally wouldn't change mouthpieces and barrels at the same time (you'll never be sure which is doing what). Decide what you're trying to change, then perhaps contact one of the custom makers (I've had experience with Clark Fobes, Walter Grabner and Chris Hill - they're all very interested in helping and very knowledgeable).

Keep in mind, though, that a "big nice sound that gets noticed in orchestra" doesn't mean the same thing to everyone and that in any case, the equipment doesn't make your sound, it only makes it easier or more difficult to achieve what you're looking (listening) for.

Good luck,
Karl

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org