Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Houvenagel vs. Leblanc
Author: Bill 
Date:   2006-10-01 23:13

I've had the interesting opportunity this weekend to compare two very different 1950s Leblanc clarinets. One is a "Symphonie" (#4971) and the other is a "Dynamique" (#4325) just back from Vytas Krass' shop.

My best judgement says that it is not the best idea to compare two clarinets (or mouthpieces) side-by-side. That sets up a "win/lose" environment, and one piece of equipment always "loses." Better to test something over a period of time, by itself. But I couldn't resist the temptation to compare these two instruments, which are basically from the same era, which are physically identical, and which represent Leblanc's two polarities of design at that time.

I had complained that my "Symphonie" had a small, sort of prissy, almost "squawkish" tone quality (while having many other very positive traits). It was no surprise for me when I played the Dynamique and discovered the fuller, much more mellow sound. I instantly preferred it over the Symphonie. My very limited understanding of these two old models is that the Symphonie was the smaller bore design, and the Dynamique the larger. I have no more specific knowledge about these clarinets beyond this generality.

Pleased as I am with the Dynamique, as the weekend passed I found my preference regarding these two clarinets switching. Despite a more modest tone, the Symphonie seemed to "center" on the individual notes, to be a more refined tool, like the difference between a sharp lead pencil and a crayon or pastel. Its properties were more intimate, but also more satisfying artistically.

Of course, in the end we always play the best we can, capitalizing on an individual clarinet's outstanding qualities and compensating for its shortcomings. In the long run, it is the performer and not the equipment. But I did find this comparison especially interesting. Both clarinets are fabulous - keepers!

Bill.

Bill Fogle
Ellsworth, Maine
(formerly Washington, DC)


Reply To Message
 
 Re: Houvenagel vs. Leblanc
Author: bill28099 
Date:   2006-10-02 04:00

I too have owned a Symphonie and a Dynamique and compaired them side by side with my music teacher. The Symphonie is now gone, neither of us liked it. Now maybe it was just a substandard horn, even Leblanc makes one every now and then. The Dynamique is a great horn, likely even better then the LL that I play every day.

A great teacher gives you answers to questions
you don't even know you should ask.

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org