Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Another try: Wood versus Plastic
Author: Rene 
Date:   2003-03-07 10:01

I recently got the chance to compare the plastic B12 to three wooden clarinets, the Buffet Conservatoire, the Buffet RC, and the Selmer Odysée on a one to one basis. This is not easy deep in the land of the German system.

I played all with the same mouthpiece, an M13 Lyre, the same good Vandoren reed, ligature and in case of the Selmer, even with the same reed position.

First of all, the difference was not the sound!

For a start, all were nearly perfect in intonation, the Convervatoire being on 440 Hz. The Odysée comes with two barrels, and the B12 playes on 442 Hz very precisely. People did love my sound on all of them in all registers, but voted for the B12, which gave me a shock. So, trying to impress your beloved with the sound of your new expensive wooden clarinet may not be the best idea.

[huh]

The most obvious difference was the size of the tone holes in the upper joint. The B12 uses pads around 8mm, while the others are like 10mm. But the B12 hasn't a smaller sound! Matters don`t seem to be that easy. The other obvious difference was the stability and quality of the keywork. Everything just looks more fragile on the B12, including the springs. The positive effect is the weight of the instrument, which makes it suitable for beginners.

While the keywork can obviously be felt during the play, especially in the long little finger keys, I noticed another effect. The B12 collects much more water at the inside, though its bore looks like a mirror. The water even finally stopped the throat A and G#. I attribute this to the material, which stays a lot colder during play, and also to the smaller tone holes.

I am not in a position to compare the wooden Buffet and the Selmer. Only, that I did not notice much difference between the Conservatoir and the RC, and that the Buffet impressed me with a nice C#/G#.

Thanks for listening, awaiting your comments,

René

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Another try: Wood versus Plastic
Author: BobD 
Date:   2003-03-07 11:54

The condensation thing with the B12 coincides with my experience also but my experience has been that plastic horns in general exhibit that problem moreso than wood ones. I'm thinking that maybe it's primarily due to the plastic barrel. Haven't tried a wood bbl on the B12 yet.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Another try: Wood versus Plastic
Author: FrankM 
Date:   2003-03-07 12:33

I got a B12 from eBay a few months ago. I wanted a "kick around" horn for outdoor dixieland type gigs. I was very pleased with the sound and feel. I really believe if one of the big companies put as much care into a plastic model that they do in their top of the line wooden models, you'd have a horn comparable in everyway to a wooden one....except they'd be virtually indestructable! I've heard plastic oboes are becoming accepted by pros.....maybe we're next!

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org