The Clarinet BBoard
|
Author: Phat Cat
Date: 2003-09-03 12:27
Here are a pair links to articles on the physics of voicing in woodwind instruments and the clarinet:
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/reprints/FritzEtAl.pdf
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/reprints/tongueSMAC.pdf
These are pdf files of papers published by physicists in Proc. Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference. For those of you whose idea of a good time does not include curling up with a good set of mathematics equations, I’ll attempt a summary.
Even moderately advanced clarinetists know that voicing plays an important role in the production of a fine clarinet sound. Voicing involves the shape and position of the various members of the oral cavity, especially the glottis and the tongue. It is so named because such adjustments account for the differences between various vowel sounds, and it is often taught by such descriptions as the “eeee” or “ahhhh” position of the tongue. These adjustments affect the timbre (color, quality, brightness/darkness) of the tone as well as the pitch.
The authors of the above referenced articles use mechanical set-ups to measure various effects described by musicians. They also develop mathematical models to account for the observed measurements. Essentially, the vocal tract is impedance coupled acoustically to the bore of the clarinet through the opening between the reed and the mouthpiece. When the tongue is low, the impedance of the vocal cavity is very small compared to that of the clarinet bore and has negligible effect. When the tongue is high, it acts as an impedance matching transformer linking the small volume of the vocal tract to that of the clarinet bore. In laymen’s terms, with appropriate positioning of the tongue, the vocal tract becomes an extension of the resonating body of the interior of the clarinet.
This mechanism is similar to what happens when a professional singer voices his/her tone, but is not identical. In the case of the singer, the sound production mechanism is the vocal chords. The vocal/nasal cavity acts as THE resonating chamber, emphasizing some tones and deemphasizing others. For example, measurements have demonstrated that certain positioning of the throat elicits prominent harmonic resonances called formants that give opera voices their distinct sound. Finally, the audible components of the sound emerge from the mouth and to a lesser extend the nose.
In the case of the clarinet, the sound production mechanism is the reed and the primary resonance chamber is the interior of the clarinet, including the mouthpiece chamber, the barrel and a length of the clarinet bore depending on what note is fingered. The audible sound emerges from the body of the instrument: from the bell for the long-fingered notes and from tone holes for other notes. When the vocal cavity is properly formed—that is, the sound is voiced—the vocal cavity becomes an extension to the resonating chamber. This changes the timbre and pitch of the produced note, just as do changes in bore geometry (e.g., poly-cylindrical bore) and bore length (raising/lowering a key or pulling the barrel). However, the audible sound still emerges from the body of the clarinet.
Although this particular article does not address it specifically, no audible sound is contributed by the vocal chamber itself. The sound waves generated in the vocal cavity by the reed cannot emerge directly because the lips seal the mouthpiece and the nasal passage is closed off. Body tissue dampens any sound passing through it to a level far below audibility compared to the sound level emerging from the clarinet bore. The audible effect of voicing is by modifying the resonance properties of the clarinet bore not by adding separate sounds to it.
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: LeWhite
Date: 2003-09-03 13:21
What an interesting read...
Is there any evidence that suggests having your tonsils out changes or has some sort of impact on your sound? After having mine out last year, I SWEAR I sound different, and the feel of playing is different too...
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Ken Shaw ★2017
Date: 2003-09-03 14:06
This was discussed a couple of years ago on the Klarinet board. Experiments with an artifical embouchure showed that, at least with that setup, the best sound was produced when the chamber volume inside the "mouth" was very large -- i.e., when the mouth cavity was *de-coupled* from the air on the other side of the reed.
See http://www.woodwind.org/Databases/Logs/1998/12/000764.txt and
http://www.woodwind.org/Databases/Logs/2001/10/000941.txt .
For more, go to http://www.woodwind.org/Databases/LogsIndex/index.html and search on "artifical embouchure" (with the quotes).
This goes against experience. I like the sound I get when I have a largish cavity at the front of my mouth and the back of my tongue high, but if I drop the back of my tongue, increasing the total amount of space, the sound loses resonance. I could of course be doing something different from what it feels like, but I definitely feel and hear changes when I adjust my tongue and palate position, and I use these adjustments to produce the tone color I want for the particular passage.
Who else does this, and what do you think happens?
Best regards.
Ken Shaw
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: BobD
Date: 2003-09-03 15:21
If one "practices" tuning with a tuner the effects of changing mouth,tongue,embochure positions becomes quite evident. I myself am not convinced that the nasal passages become completely closed-off as well as the eustacheon tubes. The human condition,including the sinus cavities, probably cannot be exactly duplicated with mechanics......but only approximately modeled. Remember too that what "we" hear is not what others hear.
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
Author: Phat Cat
Date: 2003-09-03 16:07
BobD:
If the nasal passage is not sealed, there will be a substantial leakage of the air stream due to the pressure differential and this would result in very short phrases. It's easy enough to check with the “breath test.” While you’re playing, have someone hold a small mirror under your nostrils and look for breath condensation. Of course, only geeks and cadavers would actually subject themselves to this.
|
|
Reply To Message
|
|
The Clarinet Pages
|
|