Keepers

Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?

Author: mrn  Date:   2008-10-07 22:44 orchestr wrote: <<So, going back to the Brazillian element, I have a big question. As we all know, Copland said, "a phrase from a currently popular Brazilian tune, heard by me in Rio, became embedded in the secondary material." Does anyone know what this "popular" Brazilian tune was?>> I wish I knew. I'll bet somebody in Brazil knows, though. Here's an interesting quote from Copland that gives further support to the argument that the Clarinet Concerto ought to be played "straight": "Some of the second movement material represents an unconscious fusion of elements obviously related to North and South American popular music: Charleston rhythms, boogie woogie, and Brazilian folk tunes." All three of these musical genres are usually played with straight (or almost straight) eighths. They're not swing.

Topics	Author	Date
Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	orchestr	2008-10-04 02:15
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Tony Pay	2008-10-04 10:25
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Tony Pay	2008-10-04 11:36
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	EEBaum	2008-10-04 15:38
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	EEBaum	2008-10-04 15:48
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	NorbertTheParrot	2008-10-04 16:17
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Ed Palanker	2008-10-04 16:19
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	NorbertTheParrot	2008-10-04 16:54
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Ed Palanker	2008-10-04 17:38
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Tony Pay	2008-10-06 01:09
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	orchestr	2008-10-06 02:08
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Ed Palanker	2008-10-06 14:36
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	William	2008-10-06 14:37
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	davyd	2008-10-06 17:04
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	mrn	2008-10-06 18:27
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	EEBaum	2008-10-06 21:06
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	nielsen57	2008-10-06 22:08
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Ed Palanker	2008-10-07 01:10
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Tony Pay	2008-10-07 05:45
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	mrn	2008-10-07 05:43
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	clarnibass	2008-10-07 10:15
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Tony Pay	2008-10-07 13:30
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	clarnibass	2008-10-07 14:27
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Tony Pay	2008-10-07 19:27
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	orchestr	2008-10-07 19:27
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Ed Palanker	2008-10-07 19:34
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	mrn	2008-10-07 22:44
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Ed Palanker	2008-10-07 22:54
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	mrn	2008-10-09 04:32
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Lelia Loban	2008-10-09 18:26
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Ed Palanker	2008-10-09 21:46
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	EEBaum	2008-10-09 22:12
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	mrn	2008-10-10 00:52
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	EEBaum	2008-10-10 05:01
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	mrn	2008-10-10 15:28
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	clarnibass	2008-10-11 16:44
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	Tony Pay	2008-10-14 03:04
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	orchestr	2008-10-13 22:05
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	mrn	2008-10-14 01:50
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	clarnibass	2008-10-14 08:53
Re: Copland Cadenza Interpretation?  new	EEBaum	2008-10-14 17:21