Woodwind.OrgThe Clarinet BBoardThe C4 standard

 
  BBoard Equipment Study Resources Music General    
 
 New Topic  |  Go to Top  |  Go to Topic  |  Search  |  Help/Rules  |  Smileys/Notes  |  Log In   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 
 Objective testing of resistance in clarinets
Author: NTSOG 
Date:   2017-03-24 05:05

Hi Folks,

I read the many responses about R13s in another posting and was interested as I have a number of different clarinets: Selmer and Buffet [several of the R13 family]. For various reasons - not playing for about four years due to hand surgery and an enthusiastic dentist grinding one of my chipped front teeth - I am having to sort through different mouthpieces and develop a new embouchure. I know that different mouthpieces with different configurations blow harder or easier. In a sense that can be tested subjectively by me, but is there any objective way of testing resistance of a standard rate/volume of air flow down through the body of an instrument?

Jim
Australia

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Objective testing of resistance in clarinets
Author: Caroline Smale 
Date:   2017-03-24 05:15

I suspect flat no amount of measuring airflow resistance would actually realistically represent the "acoustic" resistance that one encounters in a clarinet.

As an academic exercise it could be interesting but when push comes to shove as they say it's basically still "how does it feel to you" when you play on it.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Objective testing of resistance in clarinets
Author: TomS 
Date:   2017-03-24 05:23

I suspect that closing all the tone holes and with a constant pressure forcing air down the bore of the clarinet and measuring the amount of air flow might be some meaningful data, but I don't think it tells at all how the clarinet plays or the subjective resistance each player experiences.

In addition, this varies with horn to horn (same model) and my subjective impression day to day changes. One day I'll swear my Ridenour clarinet has a little less resistance than my Yamaha, the the next day it reverses.

I'm about to add a R13 to my mix ... that will be interesting to compare ... but I know I may still have subjective fluctuations.

Tom

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Objective testing of resistance in clarinets
Author: NTSOG 
Date:   2017-03-24 13:26

Hi Tom and Caroline,

It makes sense that any objective measure of resistance to air flow [if a standard form of measurement could be developed] might not relate to the musical performance or perceived performance/output of a given instrument.

As you say Tom, from day-to-day different instruments seem to blow differently depending on all sorts of factors including fatigue, mild head colds and other distractions. It's all a bit of a mystery at times! At least the clarinet is not possessed by the devil like the flute which I am learning to play!

Thank you,

Jim

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Objective testing of resistance in clarinets
Author: Dibbs 
Date:   2017-03-24 14:14

Air pressure inside the mouth might provide a better or at any rate complimentary measure of resistance.

Having said that I, think there's probably more to what we perceive as resistance than pressure and/or airflow. Acoustic impedances are most likely involved too.

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Objective testing of resistance in clarinets
Author: Mojo 
Date:   2017-03-24 16:55

I think it is about how much effort the player uses to get out the sound they want. Effort involves air pressure but can also be embouchure comfort too. Sound includes volume but also tone quality, dynamics and other aspects of playing. Different days you may have different sound goals.

MojoMP.com
Mojo Mouthpiece Work LLC
MojoMouthpieceWork@yahoo.com

Reply To Message
 
 Re: Objective testing of resistance in clarinets
Author: dorjepismo 2017
Date:   2017-03-24 17:02

I understand that Ed Pillinger actually constructed more or less an artificial clarinet player, I think in connection with his dissertation, including an embouchure, mouth cavity, and so on. Apparently, it comes reasonably close to the real thing, and allowed him to draw conclusions about what kinds of changes do and don't affect the sound. His mouthpieces are quite good, anyway, so it's probably helped him with that. That's the kind of thing it would take to objectively measure resistance and evaluate the influence of instrument, mouthpiece, reed, and player, but it seems like it could be done.



Reply To Message
 
 Re: Objective testing of resistance in clarinets
Author: Wes 
Date:   2017-03-25 01:08

Air pressure in the mouth can be easily measured while playing using a sensitive meter connected by a hose and a plastic straw into the corner of the mouth. I made such a tool many years ago and measured air pressure during playing of the the clarinet, flute, saxophone, and oboe. It was interesting, but I've not done it lately.

Reply To Message
 Avail. Forums  |  Threaded View   Newer Topic  |  Older Topic 


 Avail. Forums  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password:
 Remember my login:
   
 Forgot Your Password?
Enter your email address or user name below and a new password will be sent to the email address associated with your profile.
Search Woodwind.Org

Sheet Music Plus Featured Sale

The Clarinet Pages
For Sale
Put your ads for items you'd like to sell here. Free! Please, no more than two at a time - ads removed after two weeks.

 
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org